...
首页> 外文期刊>Australian geographical studies >The politics of forgetting: Unmaking memories and reacting to memory-place-making
【24h】

The politics of forgetting: Unmaking memories and reacting to memory-place-making

机译:遗忘的政治:揭露回忆并反应记忆

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article examines responses to place-of-memory making that provoke the memory unmaking practices which constitute the politics of forgetting. Based on in-depth interviews, participant observations, and archival research the work focuses on two tragic incidents in South Korean history, the May 18 Democratic Uprising in Gwangju in 1980 and the Sewol Ferry disaster on 16 April 2014. In both cases, once the indurate actions of the conservative national governments in power at both times became known, they provoked nationwide anger that precipitated each regime's eventual downfall. Despite widespread outrage, those in government during the respective events had support from right-wing organisations as well as private citizens both in the actions taken and the ensuing politics of forgetting that enabled them to obscure these two tragedies. We argue that the erosion of memory places using the politics of forgetting exemplified by these two events is the result of each governing party's search for exoneration. By focusing on the positive as well as the negative reactions to the memories in question, this study expands discussions on the diversity of spatial strategies that inform the politics of forgetting and remembering.
机译:本文审查了对内存地位的响应,旨在挑起构成遗忘政治的记忆露天的措施。根据深入的访谈,参与观察和档案研究,该工作侧重于韩国历史上的两个悲惨事件,于2018年5月18日湾邦民主起义,并于2014年4月16日举办令人震惊的渡轮灾害。在这两种情况下,一次保守的国家政府在两次众所周知的危险中封闭行动,他们挑起了全国范围内的愤怒,这些愤怒促使每个政权的最终垮台。尽管越来越愤怒,但各自活动期间政府的人员在右翼组织以及私人公民中的支持以及随之而来的政治使他们能够掩盖这两个悲剧的行动。我们认为,使用忘记忘记政治的记忆位置的侵蚀是这两个事件的例子是每个管理方寻求Exoneration的结果。通过专注于积极的情况以及对所讨论的记忆的负面反应,这项研究扩大了关于空间策略的多样性的讨论,这些策略通知政治忘记和记忆的政治。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号