首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Research >Beyond the post-political: is public participation in Australian cities at a turning point?
【24h】

Beyond the post-political: is public participation in Australian cities at a turning point?

机译:超越后政治时代:澳大利亚城市的公众参与是否处于转折点?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This special section builds on Planning the Post-Political City-Part 1 to examine if and how planning is showing signs of a post-democratic turn taking place in Australian cities. In Part 1, we presented a collection of papers examining Australia as a post-political landscape, exploring the new ways in which Australian publics are resisting dominant neoliberal practices and logics of growth and, in doing so, are intervening in decision-making practices to assert new forms of power and participation. In Part 2, we show how participatory practices continue to evolve. We use this brief editorial to ask a foundational question: have those implicated in the governance and management of Australian cities embarked on a post-democratic path? As they are presented with new exclusionary and managerial governance systems, the public's participation suggests at the very least that post-political and post-democratic conditions are neither immutable nor inevitable. However, more democratic forms of governance rely on a rich array of activist types and approaches requiring greater institutional support in order to challenge Australia's post-political condition.
机译:本特殊部分以“规划后政治城市第1部分”为基础,以研究规划是否以及如何显示出澳大利亚城市发生了民主后转向的迹象。在第1部分中,我们提供了一系列论文,探讨了澳大利亚作为后政治环境的情况,探讨了澳大利亚公众抵制新自由主义的主流实践和增长逻辑的新方式,并以此干预决策实践,以主张新的权力和参与形式。在第2部分中,我们将展示参与性实践如何继续发展。我们用这篇简短的社论问一个基本的问题:那些与澳大利亚城市的治理和管理有关的人是否走上了民主后的道路?由于它们具有新的排他性和管理性治理体系,因此公众的参与至少表明,政治后和民主后的状况既不是一成不变的,也不是不可避免的。但是,更民主的治理形式依赖于需要更多机构支持的一系列激进主义者类型和方法,以挑战澳大利亚的后政治状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号