首页> 外文期刊>Geographical analysis >Spatial Representations of Habitat in Competition-Colonization Models
【24h】

Spatial Representations of Habitat in Competition-Colonization Models

机译:竞争殖民化模型中人居的空间表征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Ecological models with species differentiated by competition and colonization traits have shown that some extant species in remnants of habitat go extinct after a lag. These models have, however, analyzed landscape patterns in two phases: habitat and nonhabitat. Here, the consequences of representing landscape patterns as a continuous surface of habitat quality versus as two categories are examined. With a continuous representation, the amount of habitat is constant at 100 percent, but its quality can vary from 0 to 1; with a binary representation the amount of habitat varies. Continuous landscapes with mean habitat qualities of .8, .5, and .2 are compared to binary landscapes with the proportion of habitat at .8, .5, and .2. The model projections of the abundances of species differ substantially between the two-phase and continuous representations. The effects of decreased habitat quality with no decrease in abundance exceed the effects of decreased habitat abundance. Differences between the projections for the two representations increase as the proportion of habitat and habitat quality decrease. Increases in the variance of habitat quality within the continuous representations decrease extinctions. The basic insight of earlier models, that superior competitors are at a long-term disadvantage in remnant habitat, is magnified with a continuous representation. As in the binary models, the disadvantage is lessened if the spatial variation in habitat quality is smoother, but pattern matters less in continuous landscapes. The continuous representation shows that lagged extinction is relevant to cases of habitat deterioration.
机译:具有通过竞争和定殖特性区分的物种的生态模型表明,栖息地残余物中的某些现存物种在滞后后便灭绝了。但是,这些模型已分两个阶段分析了景观格局:栖息地和非栖息地。在这里,考察了将景观格局表示为栖息地质量的连续表面而不是两个类别的后果。在连续表示的情况下,栖息地的数量恒定为100%,但其质量可以在0到1之间变化。用二进制表示,栖息地的数量各不相同。将平均栖息地质量分别为.8,.5和.2的连续景观与栖息地所占比例分别为.8,.5和2.的二元景观进行比较。在两阶段表示和连续表示之间,物种丰富度的模型预测存在很大差异。栖息地质量下降而丰度没有下降的影响超过了栖息地丰度下降的影响。随着生境比例和生境质量的降低,两种表示形式的预测之间的差异增加。在连续表示中,栖息地质量方差的增加会减少灭绝。早期模型的基本见解是,优越的竞争者在剩余的栖息地中处于长期劣势,这种现象被不断地放大。与二元模型一样,如果栖息地质量的空间变化更平滑,则缺点会减轻,但是在连续景观中,格局的重要性就降低了。连续的表述表明,滞后的灭绝与生境恶化的情况有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号