首页> 外文期刊>Geoforum >The contested spaces of Cuban development: Post-socialism, post-colonialism and the geography of transition
【24h】

The contested spaces of Cuban development: Post-socialism, post-colonialism and the geography of transition

机译:古巴发展中有争议的空间:后社会主义,后殖民主义和过渡地理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The experience of the (post)socialist South has been marginal to the study of transition, despite the many similarities between processes of transition and development. This paper tries to better understand this overlap by exploring some empirical and conceptual connections between processes of development and processes of transition in Cuba. In doing so it makes two sets of arguments. The first set of arguments concerns the nature of 'transition' itself. I use the 'contested spaces' of the Cuban (socialist) biotech sector, and specifically its attempts to attract foreign (capitalist) investment as a case study. As a high profile industry, biotechnology functioned in Cuba as a political space within which questions of transition and development could be reconfigured by blurring the boundaries between them. In turn, this has enabled the Cuban State to legitimise responses to transition that would otherwise have appeared contradictory. The second set of arguments try to explain how this was possible. I argue that the slippage between nationalist and socialist visions of development allowed biotechnology (as a specifically developmentalist project) to be variously understood as, for example, a post-colonial socialist, or anti-colonial nationalist project in ways that suited the needs of transition at any one time. Such recombinations in many ways account for the non-linear and reversible nature of transition in Cuba. I speculate as to whether Bruno Latour's work on the way capitalist societies understand themselves to be 'modern', helps explain how, in (post)socialist countries, processees of transition can be shaped through different historical constructions of modernisation and development.
机译:尽管过渡与发展过程之间有许多相似之处,但(后)社会主义南方的经验对于过渡研究而言是微不足道的。本文试图通过探索古巴发展进程与转型进程之间的经验和概念联系,更好地理解这种重叠。这样做有两组参数。第一组论点涉及“过渡”本身的性质。我以古巴(社会主义)生物技术行业的“有争议的空间”为例,特别是它试图吸引外国(资本主义)投资的尝试。作为一个备受瞩目的产业,生物技术在古巴发挥了政治空间的作用,在其中可以通过模糊两者之间的界限来重新配置过渡和发展问题。反过来,这使古巴国家能够使对过渡的反应合法化,否则本来就显得矛盾。第二组参数试图解释这是怎么可能的。我认为,民族主义和社会主义发展观之间的失误使生物技术(作为专门的发展主义项目)被不同地理解为例如后殖民社会主义或反殖民主义的民族主义项目,其方式适合过渡的需求在任何时候。这种重新组合从许多方面解释了古巴过渡的非线性和可逆性。我推测布鲁诺·拉图尔(Bruno Latour)在资本主义社会将自己理解为“现代”方式方面的工作是否有助于解释在(后)社会主义国家中,过渡进程如何通过现代化和发展的不同历史结构来塑造。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号