...
首页> 外文期刊>Fuel >Technical performance analysis and economic evaluation of a compressed air energy storage system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle
【24h】

Technical performance analysis and economic evaluation of a compressed air energy storage system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle

机译:结合有机朗肯循环的压缩空气储能系统的技术性能分析和经济评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Energy storage becomes increasingly important in balancing electricity supply and demand due to the rise of intermittent power generation from renewable sources. The compressed air energy storage (CAES) system as one of the large scale (> 100 MW) energy storage technologies has been commercially deployed in Germany and the USA. However, the efficiency of current commercial CAES plants still needs to be improved. In this study, an integrated system consisting of a CAES system and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) was proposed to recover the waste heat from intercoolers and aftercooler in the charging process and exhaust stream of the recuperator in discharging process of the CAES system. Steady state process models of the CAES system and ORC were developed in Aspen Plus (R). These models were validated using data from the literature and the results appear in a good agreement. Process analysis was carried out using the validated models regarding the impact of different organic working fluids (R123, R134a, R152a, R245fa, R600a) of ORC and expander inlet pressures of the ORC on system performance. It was found that integrating ORC with the CAES system as well as selecting appropriate working fluid was a reasonable approach for improving performance of the CAES system. The round-trip efficiency was improved by 3.32-3.95% using five working fluids, compared to that of the CAES system without ORC. Economic evaluation on levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) was performed using Aspen Process Economic Analyser (R) (APEA). Different working fluids in ORC and different power sources (e.g. wind and solar) associated with the integrated system were considered to estimate the LCOEs. It was found that the LCOEs for the integrated system were competitive with fossil-fuel fired power and even lower than offshore wind power and solar power. The proposed research presented in this paper hopes to shed light on how to improve efficiency and reduce cost when implementing CAES.
机译:由于可再生能源间歇性发电的兴起,储能在平衡电力供需方面变得越来越重要。作为大规模(> 100 MW)储能技术之一的压缩空气储能(CAES)系统已在德国和美国商业部署。但是,当前的商业CAES工厂的效率仍然需要提高。在这项研究中,提出了一个由CAES系统和有机朗肯循环(ORC)组成的集成系统,以在CAES系统的排放过程中从中冷器和后冷器的充装过程和换热器的排气流中回收余热。在Aspen Plus(R)中开发了CAES系统和ORC的稳态过程模型。这些模型已使用来自文献的数据进行了验证,结果显示出很好的一致性。使用经过验证的模型对ORC的不同有机工作流体(R123,R134a,R152a,R245fa,R600a)以及ORC的膨胀机入口压力对系统性能的影响进行了过程分析。发现将ORC与CAES系统集成以及选择合适的工作流体是提高CAES系统性能的合理方法。与不使用ORC的CAES系统相比,使用五种工作液的往返效率提高了3.32-3.95%。使用Aspen Process Economic Analyzer(R)(APEA)进行了平均电费(LCOE)的经济评估。考虑到ORC中的不同工作流体以及与集成系统相关的不同电源(例如风能和太阳能)来估计LCOE。结果发现,集成系统的LCOE与化石燃料发电相比具有竞争力,甚至低于海上风能和太阳能。本文提出的拟议研究旨在阐明实施CAES时如何提高效率和降低成本。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fuel》 |2018年第1期|318-330|共13页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England;

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England;

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England;

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England;

    Univ Sheffield, Fac Engn, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England;

    Tsinghua Univ, Dept Chem Engn, State Key Lab Chem Engn, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Energy storage; Compressed air energy storage (CAES); Organic Rankine cycle (ORC); Process simulation; Economic evaluation;

    机译:储能;压缩空气储能(CAES);有机朗肯循环(ORC);过程模拟;经济评估;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号