【24h】

10 Conclusions

机译:10结论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We have reviewed the models and methods for measuring portfolio performance and the evidence on the performance of professionally managed investment portfolios. Our review includes traditional measures, their properties and some of the important problems associated with the early measures. We also reviewed the more recent Conditional Performance Evaluation literature, weight-based performance measures and the stochastic discount factor approach, along with the evidence that these newer measures have produced. Our discussion has touched on equity style mutual funds, pension funds, asset allocation style funds, fixed income funds, and hedge funds. We draw several broad conclusions about the evidence that the literature has produced on fund performance, its relation to the efficiency of the markets, and also about future directions that we would like the literature to take.
机译:我们已经审查了用于衡量投资组合绩效的模型和方法,以及有关专业管理投资组合绩效的证据。我们的审查包括传统措施,其性质以及与早期措施相关的一些重要问题。我们还回顾了最新的《条件绩效评估》文献,基于权重的绩效测度和随机折现因子方法,以及这些新测度产生的证据。我们的讨论涉及股票型共同基金,养老基金,资产配置类基金,固定收益基金和对冲基金。我们就文献关于基金绩效,与市场效率的关系以及我们希望文献采取的未来方向得出的证据得出一些广泛的结论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Foundations and trends in finance》 |2006年第2期|97-98|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:21:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号