...
首页> 外文期刊>Fortune >AMERICA'S 400 RICHEST:NOT A CLUB BUT A COLLECTIVE(REALLY!)
【24h】

AMERICA'S 400 RICHEST:NOT A CLUB BUT A COLLECTIVE(REALLY!)

机译:美国400富豪:不是俱乐部,而是集体(真的!)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Thanking the IRS is probably not the sentiment most in your heart at this time of year, but in fact the revenu-ers have given us something valuable. It's a trove of data that paints a picture of America's super-rich, and the picture wouldbe unrecognizable to many people. We should study it especially at tax time, as the topic of economic inequality inevitably heats up. The Occupy Wall Street movement will try to revive itself, and once again we'll hear plenty about the outrageous wealth of the 1%. But almost all the discussion is built on a flimsy foundation, an unspoken assumption that's wrong. The debate generally assumes that the 1% are a group of plutocrats who have found a way to rake in staggering incomes year after year. For example, a recent New York Times report on research by economist Emmanuel Saez begins, "Incomes rose more than 11% for the top 1% of earners during the economic recovery, but not at all for everybody else, according to new data," prompting an image of someone in a Manhattan skyscraper or a Silicon Valley corporate campus whose huge income just gets huger year after year.
机译:在一年中的这个时候,对IRS表示感谢可能不是您最想念的,但实际上,收货人给了我们一些宝贵的东西。这是大量数据,描绘了美国超级富豪的景象,而这幅画对于许多人来说是无法识别的。随着经济不平等的话题不可避免地升温,我们应该特别在税收时研究它。 “占领华尔街”运动将努力使自己恢复活力,而我们将再次听到很多有关1%的惊人财富的信息。但是,几乎所有讨论都建立在脆弱的基础上,这是一个不言而喻的错误假设。辩论通常假设1%的是一群富豪,他们发现了一种逐年赚取惊人收入的方法。例如,《纽约时报》最近发表的关于经济学家伊曼纽尔·塞兹(Emmanuel Saez)的研究报告开始说:“在经济复苏期间,收入最高的1%收入人群的收入增长了11%以上,而其他所有人的收入却根本没有增长,”在曼哈顿的摩天大楼或硅谷的公司园区中树立某人的形象,这些人的年收入越来越大。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fortune》 |2013年第5期|51-51|共1页
  • 作者

    Geoff Colvin;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号