首页> 外文期刊>Foresight >Conjuring clean energy: exposing green assumptions in media and academia
【24h】

Conjuring clean energy: exposing green assumptions in media and academia

机译:打造清洁能源:在媒体和学术界揭示绿色假设

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper aims to present uncomfortable questions about the viability of alternative energy technologies, which arise during economic contraction but are scarcely addressed within media and academia. Design/methodology/approach - The author identifies and graphically illustrates distinct differences between media coverage of energy production and energy reduction strategies during an oil price shock beginning in 2003. Findings - In writing about alternative energy production, journalists used promising storytelling and future-oriented language to frame these technologies as solutions to climate change. Meanwhile, journalists described energy reduction strategies using mundane language anchored in the present and not as strongly linked to climate change. For example, one in seven articles associated alternative energy production with energy independence. Only 1 in 5,000 linked energy reduction strategies to energy independence. Research limitations/implications - These observations loosely illustrate a pervasive energy production ethos (a reflexive network including behaviors, symbols, expectations and material conditions). Considering this ethos during a time of economic contraction exposes hidden assumptions about alternative energy technologies and the fossil fuels that they are expected to replace, as well as numerous unasked questions. For instance, does the high cost of alternative energy ultimately reveal hidden fossil fuel use behind the curtain? Where does the high cost of alternative energy ultimately accrue, if not to fossil fuels (via labor, materials, etc.)? Practical implications - This paper presents questions that journalists, policymakers, energy researchers and students can use to critically assess energy narratives. Originality/value - This paper critically explores numerous assumptions, which undergird belief that renewable energy production will ease hardship during transitions toward contraction and degrowth.
机译:目的-本文旨在提出有关替代能源技术可行性的令人不安的问题,这些问题在经济紧缩期间出现,但在媒体和学术界却很少得到解决。设计/方法/方法-作者确定并以图形方式说明了2003年油价震荡期间能源生产和节能策略的媒体报道之间的明显差异。调查结果-在撰写有关替代能源的文章时,记者使用了有前途的讲故事和面向未来的方法这些技术构成应对气候变化解决方案的语言。同时,记者们用当下固定的平凡语言描述了节能策略,而这种语言与气候变化的联系并不紧密。例如,七分之一的文章将替代能源生产与能源独立性联系起来。 5,000个中只有1个将节能策略与能源独立性联系在一起。研究的局限性/意义-这些观察大致松散地说明了普遍的能源生产精神(包括行为,符号,期望和物质条件的自反网络)。在经济紧缩时期考虑这种精神,就暴露了关于替代能源技术和有望替代的化石燃料的隐含假设,以及许多未解决的问题。例如,替代能源的高昂成本是否最终揭示了幕后隐藏的化石燃料的使用?如果不是化石燃料(通过人工,材料等),替代能源的高成本最终会在哪里产生?实际意义-本文提出了记者,政策制定者,能源研究人员和学生可以用来批判性地评估能源叙述的问题。原创性/价值-本文批判性地探索了许多假设,这使人们相信,可再生能源生产将在向收缩和退化的过渡过程中减轻困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号