首页> 外文期刊>Foreign affairs >The Indian-Pakistani Divide Why India Is Democratic and Pakistan Is Not
【24h】

The Indian-Pakistani Divide Why India Is Democratic and Pakistan Is Not

机译:印巴分歧为什么印度是民主的而巴基斯坦不是

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Since 1995, when the historian Ayesha Jalal's pathbreaking and controversial book Democracy and Authoritarianism in South Asia was published, there has been no serious study comparing the political trajectories of India and Pakistan. Those who have tried to fill this gap have succumbed to the temptation of attributing India's democracy to Hinduism and Pakistan's autocracy to Islam-a reductionist and not particularly productive approach, since religion is usually only secondary in explaining political trajectories, whether it is Indonesia's democratization or Sri Lanka's march to dictatorship. In the remarkable India, Pakistan, and Democracy, Philip Oldenburg, a research scholar at Columbia University, is wise enough not to resort to such sociocultural explanations. Instead, he examines historical, political, sociological, cultural, and external factors to explain the reasons why India and Pakistan diverged.
机译:自1995年以来,历史学家阿耶莎·贾拉尔(Ayesha Jalal)开创性和颇有争议的《南亚民主与威权主义》一书出版以来,还没有进行过认真的研究来比较印度和巴基斯坦的政治轨迹。那些试图填补这一空白的人屈服于将印度的民主归于印度教而将巴基斯坦的专制归于伊斯兰教的诱惑-这是一种还原论者,而不是特别是富有成效的方法,因为宗教通常只在解释政治轨迹时处于次要地位,无论是印度尼西亚的民主化还是印度尼西亚。斯里兰卡走向独裁。在非凡的印度,巴基斯坦和民主国家,哥伦比亚大学的研究学者菲利普·奥尔登堡(Philip Oldenburg)非常明智,不求助于这种社会文化的解释。相反,他研究了历史,政治,社会,文化和外部因素,以解释印度和巴基斯坦分裂的原因。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Foreign affairs》 |2011年第2期|p.140-145|共6页
  • 作者

    Christophe Jaffrelot;

  • 作者单位

    Center for International Studies and Research at Sciences Po, in Paris;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号