...
首页> 外文期刊>Forbes >Amazon Warfare
【24h】

Amazon Warfare

机译:亚马逊战争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With state budgets a mess, a court ruling in January in New York was the perfect excuse for politicians nationwide to pounce. The ruling, by a state trial court, upheld New York's year-old law forcing Amazon to collect sales taxes on mail orders delivered to New York. Legislators in six states are pushing bills copying New York's. Others seized on the ruling as a reason Congress should force Internet retailers to collect sales tax for all states. All this even though Amazon is appealing.rnBattles over state taxers' cross-border reach are as old as the Constitution's Commerce Clause, which leaves it to Congress to regulate interstate business. But states are using new guerrilla tactics as multistate companies concoct fresh ways to dodge levies and Internet retailing grabs potential tax revenues. The Supreme Court ruled long ago that a seller doesn't have to collect sales taxes forrna state unless it has a physical presence in that state. (The buyer of the goods, in most states, still owes the tax-but that tax is collected on the honor system.) New York's new lawrnattempts to finesse that ruling by attributing the in-state presence of Amazon's New York affiliate sellers to Amazon.
机译:由于州预算混乱,一月份纽约法院的判决是全国政客猛扑的完美借口。州初审法院的裁决维持了纽约州历史悠久的法律,该法律迫使亚马逊对交付给纽约的邮件订单收取营业税。六个州的立法者正在推动抄袭纽约州的法案。其他人抓住这一裁决,将其作为国会应迫使互联网零售商向所有州征收营业税的原因。尽管亚马逊很有吸引力,所有这一切。关于州纳税人跨境影响的斗争与《宪法》的《商业条款》一样古老,该条款由国会来监管州际交易。但是各州正在使用新的游击策略,因为多州公司编造了新的方式来规避征税,而互联网零售也获得了潜在的税收收入。最高法院很久以前就裁定,除非卖方在该州有实体存在,否则不必向该州征收营业税。 (在大多数州,商品的买家仍欠税,但该税是在荣誉制度中收取的。)纽约的新法律试图通过将亚马逊在纽约的联属卖家在州内的存在归因于亚马逊来细化这一裁决。 。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Forbes》 |2009年第6期|4244|共2页
  • 作者

    Asher Hawkins;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号