首页> 外文期刊>Fleet Equipment >Demystifying the World of Antifreeze / Coolant
【24h】

Demystifying the World of Antifreeze / Coolant

机译:揭开防冻液/冷却液世界的神秘面纱

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Q Why Can 1 Million Mile AFC Change Interval Claims Be Harmful To Your Engine? A Despite their eye-catching nature, recent claims of 1 million mile AFC change intervals aren't based on any new science or coolant formulation, they just imply that existing coolants now have the ability to offer as much as 67% more miles of engine and coolant-system protection. Therefore, operators of heavy duty vehicles shouldn't take at face value 1 million mile claims that could end up doing nothing more than putting their engines at risk. They should also be aware that while heavy duty engines have become increasingly more sophisticated in recent years, most coolant formulations have remained the same since the days when a 200,000-mile change interval was considered groundbreaking.
机译:问:为什么一百万英里AFC变更间隔声明对您的引擎有害? A尽管具有引人注目的特性,但最近宣称的100万英里AFC更换间隔并不是基于任何新的科学或冷却液配方,它们只是暗示现有的冷却液现在能够提供多达67%的发动机续航力和冷却液系统保护。因此,重型车辆的运营商不应以其面值1百万英里来宣称自己最终只会使引擎处于危险之中而无所作为。他们还应该意识到,尽管近年来重型发动机变得越来越复杂,但自从200,000英里的更换间隔被认为具有开创性以来,大多数冷却液配方一直保持不变。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Fleet Equipment》 |2013年第4期|20-20|共1页
  • 作者

    Colin Dilley;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号