【24h】

Put to the test

机译:经过测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PRIOR TO the Grenfell disaster, another tragedy should have put the fire safety of buildings at the top of the agenda. Instead, the Lakanal House fire stayed under the radar, and issues it raised such as the absence of a fire risk assessment (FRA) and the confusion around who the responsible person was were never fully addressed. In the time between Lakanal in 2009 and Grenfell in 2017, the construction industry carried on as normal. A culture developed in which, in many cases, cost trumped safety and quality. Despite phenomenal build costs for projects, the construction industry's small profit margins led to highly competitive bidding that undercut competitors.This resulted in value engineering and inadequate or inappropriate products often being specified for buildings, This same level of carelessness extended to the use of desktop studies, where products and materials are not tested together in the way they will be used on a building.
机译:在格伦费尔(Grenfell)灾难发生之前,另一场悲剧应将建筑物的消防安全放在首位。取而代之的是,Lakanal House的火灾一直处于雷达之下,并引发了一些问题,例如没有火灾风险评估(FRA)以及对负责人谁没有得到彻底解决的困惑。从2009年的Lakanal到2017年的Grenfell,建筑业照常运作。在一种文化中,在许多情况下,成本已超过了安全性和质量。尽管项目的建设成本惊人,但建筑行业的微薄利润率导致竞争激烈的投标削​​弱了竞争者的利益,这导致价值工程和通常为建筑物指定的产品不足或不适当。 ,即产品和材料未按将在建筑物上使用的方式一起进行测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号