...
首页> 外文期刊>The Financial Review (Statesboro) >Split Ratings and Differences in Corporate Credit Rating Policy between Moody's and Standard & Poor's
【24h】

Split Ratings and Differences in Corporate Credit Rating Policy between Moody's and Standard & Poor's

机译:穆迪公司与标准普尔公司之间信用评级政策的等级划分和差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates split credit ratings awarded by Moody's and Standard & Poor's (S&P) to U.S. corporations. Bivariate probit model estimates, analyzing 5,238 firm-year observations from dual-rated S&P 500/400/600 index-constituent corporations, indicate firm-specific financial and governance characteristics predict split ratings. Large, profitable companies with enhanced interest coverage, a greater percentage of independent directors, and more institutional investment are less likely to receive splits. Moody's appears more conservative in its evaluations, assigning lower ratings to smaller, less profitable companies with low interest coverage. Moody's also associates external, independent constraints on managerial autonomy with a higher corporate credit standing relative to S&P.
机译:本文研究了穆迪和标准普尔(S&P)授予美国公司的分割信用等级。双变量概率模型估计值分析了双重评级的标准普尔500/400/600指数成分公司的5238个公司年度观察结果,表明特定于公司的财务和治理特征可预测不同的评级。具有更大利益覆盖范围,更大比例的独立董事以及更多机构投资的大型,盈利性公司获得分拆的可能性较小。穆迪(Moody's)的评估似乎更为保守,将较低的评级分配给利息覆盖率较低的规模较小,利润较低的公司。穆迪还将管理自主权的外部,独立约束与相对于标准普尔而言更高的企业信誉联系在一起。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号