...
首页> 外文期刊>Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures >Comparison of HCF life prediction methods based on different critical planes under multiaxial variable amplitude loading
【24h】

Comparison of HCF life prediction methods based on different critical planes under multiaxial variable amplitude loading

机译:多轴可变振幅载荷下基于不同临界面的HCF寿命预测方法比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

High-cycle fatigue life prediction methods based on different critical planes, including the maximum shear stress (MSS) plane, the weighted average shear stress plane and the Maximum Variance shear stress plane, are compared by two multiaxial cycle counting methods, i.e. the main and auxiliary channels (MAC) counting and the relative equivalent stress counting. A modified damage model is used to calculate the multiaxial fatigue damage. Compared with the experimental lives for 7075-T651 aluminium alloy, the predicted results show that the MSS method together with MAC counting is suitable for the multiaxial fatigue life prediction.
机译:通过两种多轴循环计数方法,分别比较了基于不同临界平面(包括最大剪切应力(MSS)平面,加权平均剪切应力平面和最大方差剪切应力平面)的高周疲劳寿命预测方法。辅助通道(MAC)计数和相对等效应力计数。修改后的损伤模型用于计算多轴疲劳损伤。与7075-T651铝合金的实验寿命相比,预测结果表明,MSS方法与MAC计数相结合适用于多轴疲劳寿命预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号