首页> 外文期刊>Explorations in economic history >Socioeconomic inequalities in death from past to present: An introduction
【24h】

Socioeconomic inequalities in death from past to present: An introduction

机译:过去到现在的死亡社会经济不平等:简介

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the early postwar period, improvements in life expectancy in many Western countries made health authorities, health scientists and politicians believe that social differences in mortality converged. The assumption was that inequality, when measured as death rates, was on steady decline, possibly even on the brink of disappearing. The question is then, how far back in time can social differences in mortality be traced? Can they be traced back to the agricultural society or are they a result of industrialization? Whether or not these differences are the result of the industrial revolution became a lively debated issue at the time and has continued to be discussed to date. While many scholars have taken a Malthusian view, that mortality in the past was largely determined by economic factors, others argue that mortality was determined by non-economic factors, leaving little room for a social gradient in mortality. Due to lack of coherent data covering long time periods, our knowledge has been based on bits and pieces of evidence from various locations and time periods. The evidence used is not only fragmentary but furthermore only partly comparable as different definitions of social class and mortality have been used. Here we present results from seven new studies of locations in Western and Southern Europe, the US and Canada for which individual-level longitudinal data exists during the industrialization period. Most of these studies cover also the first part of the twentieth century, a period for which such microdata hitherto has largely been lacking. Taken together, they have a wide geographic coverage and a very long time horizon. Based on these studies, we argue that social differences appeared both long before and long after the industrial breakthrough, in both cases implying that these differences are not directly related to industrialization. We also argue that the association between income and mortality observed today most likely is a recent phenomenon. Overall, a causal link between income and mortality is put into question.
机译:战后初期,许多西方国家的预期寿命提高,使卫生当局,卫生科学家和政治人物相信死亡率的社会差异趋于一致。假设是,当以死亡率衡量时,不平等现象正在稳定下降,甚至可能在消失的边缘。问题是,可以追溯到死亡率的社会差异有多远?它们可以追溯到农业社会还是工业化的结果?这些差异是否是工业革命的结果,在当时成为一个热烈讨论的问题,并且至今仍在继续讨论。尽管许多学者采取了马尔萨斯主义的观点,但过去的死亡率很大程度上是由经济因素决定的,而另一些人则认为,死亡率是由非经济因素决定的,几乎没有留下死亡率的社会梯度的余地。由于缺乏涵盖长时间的连贯数据,我们的知识是基于来自不同位置和时间段的点点滴滴的证据。由于使用了不同的社会阶层和死亡率定义,所使用的证据不仅是零散的,而且还仅是部分可比的。在这里,我们提供了来自对西欧和南欧,美国和加拿大的七个新研究的结果,这些研究在工业化时期都存在个人级别的纵向数据。这些研究大多数都涵盖了20世纪上半叶,而在此期间,至今仍远远缺乏这种微数据。两者合计,它们具有广泛的地理覆盖范围和很长的时间范围。基于这些研究,我们认为社会差异在工业突破之前和之后都出现了,这两种情况都暗示着这些差异与工业化没有直接关系。我们还认为,今天观察到的收入和死亡率之间的关联很可能是最近的现象。总体而言,收入与死亡率之间的因果关系受到质疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号