首页> 外文期刊>Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research >Hospital non-price competition under the Global Budget Payment and Prospective Payment Systems
【24h】

Hospital non-price competition under the Global Budget Payment and Prospective Payment Systems

机译:全球预算支付和预期支付系统下的医院非价格竞争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper provides theoretical analyses of two alternative hospital payment systems forncontrolling medical cost: the Global Budget Payment System (GBPS) and the ProspectivenPayment System (PPS). The former method assigns a fixed total budget for all healthcarenservices over a given period with hospitals being paid on a fee-for-service basis. The latternmethod is usually connected with a fixed payment to hospitals within a Diagnosis-RelatednGroup. Our results demonstrate that, given the same expenditure, the GBPS wouldnapproach optimal levels of quality and efficiency as well as the level of social welfarenprovided by the PPS, as long as market competition is sufficiently high; our results alsondemonstrate that the treadmill effect, modeling an inverse relationship between price andnquantity under the GBPS, would be a quality-enhancing and efficiency-improving outcomendue to market competition.
机译:本文提供了两种用于控制医疗费用的替代医院支付系统的理论分析:全球预算支付系统(GBPS)和ProspectivenPayment系统(PPS)。前一种方法为给定时期内的所有医疗服务分配固定的总预算,而医院则按服务付费。后一种方法通常与诊断相关组中的医院进行固定付款有关。我们的结果表明,在相同的支出下,只要市场竞争足够高,GBPS就无法达到PPS提供的最佳质量和效率水平以及社会福利水平。我们的结果还表明,跑步机效应通过模拟GBPS下价格与数量之间的反比关系,可以提高质量,并提高效率,这归因于市场竞争。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号