...
首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect
【24h】

Searching for two feature singletons in the visual scene: the localized attentional interference effect

机译:在视觉场景中搜索两个特征单例:局部注意干扰效应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The localized attentional interference (LAI) effect was investigated in a visual search task requiring participants to simultaneously monitor two spatially separated features from the same or different dimensions. In Experiment 1, the search type was blocked and targets were defined by fixed feature values in two dimensions (e.g., a yellow item and a circular item). In contrast, in Experiment 2, participants had to look for a color and a form singleton, with the exact feature values varying randomly across trials. In both experiments, reaction times (RTs) were generally slower when two features were CLOSE to, rather than DISTANT from, each other. Moreover, RTs to CLOSE stimuli increased as the search set size increased, while RTs to DISTANT stimuli were unaffected by set size. Experiment 3 also used a singleton search task, but with the two singletons defined either in different dimensions or in the same dimension. A larger interference effect for CLOSE, as compared to DISTANT, stimuli was found for cross-dimension than for intra-dimension targets. These findings suggest that neighboring items, irrespective of whether these items are from the same or different dimensions, interfere with each other in attentional selection, and that searching for two cross-dimension targets may engage a process of dimension switching to effectively solve the ambiguity of each item, especially when these items are close to each other.
机译:在视觉搜索任务中调查了局部注意干扰(LAI)效果,要求参与者同时监视来自相同或不同维度的两个空间分离的特征。在实验1中,搜索类型被阻止,并且目标由二维中的固定要素值(例如,黄色项和圆形项)定义。相比之下,在实验2中,参与者必须寻找一种颜色和一种形式的单例,其确切特征值在各个试验之间随机变化。在两个实验中,当两个特征彼此靠近而不是遥远时,反应时间(RTs)通常较慢。此外,对CLOSE刺激的RTs随着搜索集大小的增加而增加,而对DISTANT刺激的RTs不受集大小的影响。实验3还使用了单例搜索任务,但是两个单例定义为不同维度或相同维度。与DISTANT相比,发现对CLOSE的干扰对跨维度的影响要比对维度内的目标大。这些发现表明,相邻的项目,无论这些项目是来自相同还是不同的维度,都会在注意力选择上互相干扰,并且寻找两个跨维度的目标可能会涉及到维度转换过程,从而有效地解决了问题的歧义。每个项目,尤其是当这些项目彼此靠近时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号