首页> 外文期刊>Experimental Brain Research >Modulating peripersonal and extrapersonal reach space via tool use: a comparison between 6- to 12-year-olds and young adults
【24h】

Modulating peripersonal and extrapersonal reach space via tool use: a comparison between 6- to 12-year-olds and young adults

机译:通过使用工具来调节人际交往和人际交往空间:6至12岁的年轻人与年轻人之间的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined age-related characteristics associated with tool use in the perception and modulation of peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Seventy-six (76) children representing age groups 7-, 9-, 11 years and 36 adults were presented with two experiments using an estimation of reach paradigm involving arm and tool conditions and a switch-block of the opposite condition. Experiment 1 tested Arm and Tool (20 cm length) estimation and found a significant effect for Age, Space, and an Age × Space interaction (ps 0.05). Both children and adults were less accurate in extrapersonal space, indicating an overestimation bias. Interestingly, the adjustment period during the switch-block condition was immediate and similar across age. Experiment 2 was similar to Experiment 1 with the exception of using a 40-cm-length tool. Results also revealed an age effect and a difference in Space (ps 0.05), however, participants underestimated. Speculatively, participants were less confident when presented with a longer tool, even though the adjustment period with both tool lengths was similar. Considered together, these results hint that: (1) children as young as 6 years of age are capable of being as accurate when estimating reach with a tool as they are with their arm, (2) the adjustment period associated with extending and retracting spaces is immediate rather than gradual, and (3) tool length influences estimations of reach.
机译:这项研究检查了与年龄相关的特征,这些特征与工具在人际和人际空间的感知和调节中的使用有关。代表7、9、11、11岁年龄段的76位(76)儿童和36位成人进行了两项实验,使用了涉及手臂和工具状况以及相反状况的切换块的到达范式的估计。实验1测试了Arm and Tool(长度为20 cm)的估计,发现对年龄,空间以及年龄×空间交互作用具有显着影响(ps <0.05)。儿童和成人在人际空间上的准确性均较差,表明存在高估偏差。有趣的是,开关阻塞状态下的调整期是即时的,并且随着年龄的增长而相似。除了使用40厘米长的工具外,实验2与实验1相似。结果还显示出年龄效应和空间差异(ps <0.05),但是参与者低估了这一点。从推测上讲,即使两种工具长度的调整期相似,参加者在使用更长的工具时也没有信心。综合考虑,这些结果表明:(1)估计6岁以下的儿童在估计使用工具时的准确度与手臂一样准确;(2)与伸展和缩回空间相关的调整期是即时而不是渐进的;(3)工具长度会影响范围的估算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号