首页> 外文期刊>European Transport Law >SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA
【24h】

SUPREME COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA

机译:大韩民国最高法院

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

1. Whether the charter party concerned in this matter belongs to time charter party? Whether a certain charter party belongs to bareboat charter, time charter or voyage charter should be determined by specifically taking into account an intent and content of the same charter party, in particular, how longer charter period is, how high amount of hire is, whether charterer obtains possession of a vessel and other charter party terms (Supreme Court Judgment of February 5, 1999 in case no. 97Dal9090). The Incheon District Court ("Original Court") determined that the charter party executed between the Owner of the Vessel, being the Opponent in this procedure, and Joyang Marine Co. Ltd. Belongs to a time charter party, pointing the circumstance as they showed in their Judgment. Considering the Original Court's reasoning in light of the above legal theory and the Litigation Records, there exists no err in the Original Court's determination that the Appellant argued in their Appeal Reason in relation to legal theory concerning category criteria for a type of charter party.
机译:1.宪章党是否有关此问题所属的宪章派对?一定的租船党是否属于赤行宪章,应通过具体考虑到同一宪章党的意图和内容,特别是租船期的意图和内容来确定,租赁期有多高,租用程度是多么高的租船人获得船只和其他宪章党条款(1999年2月5日的最高法院判决,案件没有.97DAL9090)。仁川地区法院(“原阁”)确定船舶所有者在船舶所有者之间执行的宪章党,成为本程序中的对手,而Joyang Marine Co. Ltd.属于一届宪章党,指出它们所显示的情况在他们的判断中。考虑到原来的法院鉴于上述法律理论和诉讼记录,在原法院的决心中存在没有错误,即上诉人以其上诉的原因与法律理论有关一类宪章党的法律理论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European Transport Law》 |2020年第1期|21-23|共3页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号