首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis
【24h】

Corticosteroids in peri-radicular infiltration for radicular pain: a randomised double blind controlled trial. One year results and subgroup analysis

机译:皮质类固醇在神经根周围浸润中治疗神经根性疼痛:一项随机双盲对照试验。一年的结果和亚组分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of corticosteroids in patients with radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis through a prospective randomised, double blind controlled trial, and whether there was an effect on subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery. Peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids has previously been shown to offer no additional benefit in patients with sciatica compared to local anaesthetic alone. It is not known if the response to peri-radicular infiltration is less marked in certain subgroups of patients such as those with radicular pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Previous studies have suggested that peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids may obviate the need for subsequent interventions and we therefore further investigated this in the current study. We randomised 150 patients to receive a single injection with either bupivacaine alone or bupivacaine and methylprednisolone. Patients were assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months after the injection using standard outcome measures including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue score for leg pain and patient’s subjective assessment of outcome. At 1-year follow-up, we looked at the outcome in terms of the need for subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery. At 3-month follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the standard outcome measures between the two injection groups. At a minimum 1-year post injection, there was no difference in the need for subsequent interventions in either group. Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis had a less marked reduction in the ODI at 3 months with a mean change of 3.3 points when compared with 15 points for patients with lumbar disc herniation. In conclusion, peri-radicular infiltration of corticosteroids for sciatica does not provide any additional benefit when compared to local anaesthetic injection alone. Corticosteroids do not obviate the need for subsequent interventions such as additional root blocks or surgery.
机译:这项研究的目的是通过一项前瞻性随机双盲对照试验评估皮质类固醇对腰椎间盘突出症或腰椎管狭窄引起的神经根痛患者的疗效,以及是否对随后的干预措施(例如额外的牙根阻滞)有影响或手术。以前已经证明,与单独局麻药相比,皮质类固醇的放射状周围浸润对坐骨神经痛患者没有额外的益处。尚不清楚在某些患者亚组中,如由于腰椎管狭窄引起的神经根痛的患者,对神经根周围浸润的反应是否较不明显。先前的研究表明,皮质类固醇的放射状浸润可能消除了后续干预的需要,因此我们在当前研究中对此进行了进一步研究。我们将150名患者随机分组,接受单次布比卡因或布比卡因和甲基强的松龙的单次注射。在注射后第6周和第3个月对患者进行评估,使用的标准结局指标包括Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),视觉模拟腿痛评分和患者对结局的主观评估。在为期1年的随访中,我们根据后续干预措施(例如额外的牙根阻滞或手术)的需要来评估结果。在3个月的随访中,两个注射组之间的标准结局指标无统计学差异。注射后至少一年,两组的后续干预需求无差异。腰椎管狭窄症患者在3个月时ODI降低的幅度较小,平均变化为3.3点,而腰椎间盘突出症患者的平均变化为15点。总而言之,与单独局麻药相比,皮质类固醇的放射状浸润对坐骨神经痛没有提供任何其他益处。皮质类固醇不能消除后续干预措施的需要,例如额外的牙根阻滞或手术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号