首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case–control study comparing 6 methods
【24h】

Reliability analysis for radiographic measures of lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis: a case–control study comparing 6 methods

机译:成人脊柱侧弯腰椎前凸的影像学检查的可靠性分析:一项病例对照研究,比较了6种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several methods are used to measure lumbar lordosis. In adult scoliosis patients, the measurement is difficult due to degenerative changes in the vertebral endplate as well as the coronal and sagittal deformity. We did the observational study with three examiners to determine the reliability of six methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis patients. Ninety lateral lumbar radiographs were collected for the study. The radiographs were divided into normal (Cobb < 10°), low-grade (Cobb 10°–19°), high-grade (Cobb ≥ 20°) group to determine the reliability of Cobb L1–S1, Cobb L1–L5, centroid, posterior tangent L1–S1, posterior tangent L1–L5 and TRALL method in adult scoliosis. The 90 lateral radiographs were measured twice by each of the three examiners using the six measurement methods. The data was analyzed to determine the inter- and intra-observer reliability. In general, for the six radiographic methods, the inter- and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were all ≥0.82. A comparison of the ICCs and 95% CI for the inter- and intra-observer reliability between the groups with varying degrees of scoliosis showed that, the reliability of the lordosis measurement decreased with increasing severity of scoliosis. In Cobb L1–S1, centroid and posterior tangent L1–S1 methods, the ICCs were relatively lower in the high-grade scoliosis group (≥0.60). And, the mean absolute difference (MAD) in these methods was high in the high-grade scoliosis group (≤7.17°). However, in the Cobb L1–L5 and posterior tangent L1–L5 method, the ICCs were ≥0.86 in all groups. And, in the TRALL method, the ICCs were ≥0.76 in all groups. In addition, in the Cobb L1–L5 and posterior tangent L1–L5 method, the MAD was ≤3.63°. And, in the TRALL method, the MAD was ≤3.84° in all groups. We concluded that the Cobb L1–L5 and the posterior tangent L1–L5 methods are reliable methods for measuring the global lumbar lordosis in adult scoliosis. And the TRALL method is more reliable method than other methods which include the L5–S1 joint in lordosis measurement.
机译:几种方法可用于测量腰椎前凸。在成人脊柱侧弯患者中,由于椎骨终板的退行性变化以及冠状和矢状畸形,很难进行测量。我们与三名检查员进行了观察性研究,以确定六种方法测量成人脊柱侧弯患者整体腰椎前凸的可靠性。收集了90个腰椎侧位X光片进行研究。放射线照片分为正常(Cobb <10°),低度(Cobb 10°–19°),高度(Cobb≥20°)组,以确定Cobb L1-S1,Cobb L1-L5的可靠性,成人脊柱侧弯的重心,后切线L1-S1,后切线L1-L5和TRALL方法。三位检查员分别使用六种测量方法对90幅X光片进行了两次测量。分析数据以确定观察者之间和观察者内部的可靠性。通常,对于这六个射线照相方法,类别间和类别内相关系数(ICC)均≥0.82。通过比较ICC和95%CI观察到的不同侧弯程度组之间的观察者间和内部可靠性,随着脊柱侧弯严重程度的提高,脊柱前凸测量的可靠性降低。在Cobb L1-S1,质心和后切线L1-S1方法中,高级脊柱侧弯组的ICC相对较低(≥0.60)。而且,在高度脊柱侧弯组中,这些方法的平均绝对差(MAD)高(≤7.17°)。但是,在Cobb L1-L5和后切线L1-L5方法中,所有组的ICC均≥0.86。而且,在TRALL方法中,所有组的ICC均≥0.76。此外,在Cobb L1-L5和后切线L1-L5方法中,MAD≤3.63°。而且,在TRALL方法中,所有组的MAD均≤3.84°。我们得出的结论是,Cobb L1-L5和后切线L1-L5方法是测量成人脊柱侧弯整体腰椎前凸的可靠方法。并且TRALL方法比包括L5–S1关节的前凸测量中的其他方法更为可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号