首页> 外文期刊>European Spine Journal >Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
【24h】

Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

机译:带不同辅助方法的椎弓根螺钉插入精度:比较研究的系统综述和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Studies revealed that navigation systems that provided intraoperative assistance might improve pedicle screw insertion accuracy, and also implied that different systems provided different pedicle screw insertion accuracy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to focus on the pedicle screw insertion accuracy with or without the assistance of image-guided system, and the variance among the different navigation systems. Comparative studies were searched on pedicle screw insertion accuracy between conventional and navigated method, and among different navigation systems. A total of 43 papers, including 28 clinical, 14 cadaveric and 1 model studies, were included in the current study. For clinical articles, there were 3 randomized clinical trials, 4 prospective comparative studies and 21 retrospective comparative studies. The incidence of pedicle violation among computer tomography-based navigation method group was statistically significantly less than that observed among the conventional group (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.32–0.60; in vitro: 0.24–0.75 P < 0.01). Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation system (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.27–0.48; in vitro: 0.43–0.88 P < 0.01) and three-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.09–0.38; in vitro: 0.09–0.36 P < 0.01) also obtained significant reduced screw deviation rate over traditional methods. Between navigated approaches, statistically insignificant individual and pooled RR values were observed for all in vivo subgroups. Pooled estimate of in vitro studies show that computer tomography-based and three-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system provided more accurate pedicle screw insertion over two-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system. Our review showed that navigation provided a higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws compared with conventional methods. The superiority of navigation systems was obvious when they were applied to abnormal spinal structure. Although no strong in vivo evidence has detected significantly different pedicle screw placement accuracy among the three major navigation systems, meta-analysis revealed the variance in pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different navigation methods.
机译:研究表明,提供术中协助的导航系统可能会提高椎弓根螺钉的插入精度,并且还暗示不同的系统会提供不同的椎弓根螺钉的插入精度。进行了系统的回顾和荟萃分析,着重于在有无图像引导系统的情况下椎弓根螺钉插入的准确性,以及不同导航系统之间的差异。在传统方法和导航方法之间以及不同导航系统之间的椎弓根螺钉插入精度方面进行了比较研究。本研究共纳入43篇论文,包括28篇临床研究,14篇尸体研究和1篇模型研究。对于临床文章,有3项随机临床试验,4项前瞻性比较研究和21项回顾性比较研究。基于计算机断层扫描的导航方法组的椎弓根侵犯发生率在统计学上显着低于常规组(OR 95%CI,体内:0.32-0.60;体外:0.24-0.75 P <0.01)。基于二维荧光透视的导航系统(OR 95%CI,体内:0.27–0.48;体外:0.43-0.88 P <0.01)和基于三维荧光透视的导航系统(OR 95%CI,体内:0.09 –0.38;体外:0.09–0.36 P <0.01)也比传统方法显着降低了螺钉的偏斜率。在导航方法之间,对于所有体内亚组,观察到统计学上无关紧要的个体和合并RR值。体外研究的汇总估计表明,与基于二维荧光透视的导航系统相比,基于计算机断层扫描和基于三维透视的导航系统提供了更精确的椎弓根螺钉插入。我们的研究表明,与传统方法相比,导航在椎弓根螺钉的放置中提供了更高的准确性。将导航系统应用于异常的脊柱结构时,其优越性显而易见。尽管没有强有力的体内证据检测到三种主要导航系统中椎弓根螺钉置入精度存在显着差异,但荟萃分析显示,不同导航方法的椎弓根螺钉置入精度存在差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号