首页> 外文期刊>European security >The EU and NATO's dilemmas with Russia and the prospects for deconfliction
【24h】

The EU and NATO's dilemmas with Russia and the prospects for deconfliction

机译:欧盟和北约与俄罗斯的困境和冲突的前景

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Events in Ukraine have rekindled discussions about NATO's post-Cold War purpose and the way it relates to the EU. Through EU sanctions and a traditional military response from NATO, the West has manoeuvred itself into a paradoxical situation where every step it takes to reassure its Eastern allies increases rather than diffuses tensions with Russia. On the one hand, it seems that decades of carefully crafted strategic narratives of de-escalation are now in limbo. On the other, it might have indeed been the sustained attempt to create a liberal post-Cold War order that produced an "integration dilemma", and ultimately drove Russia to the defensive realist logic of a Waltzian "security dilemma". We argue that NATO's reaction might have been based on a stylised threat and historical resentments rather than on a carefully calculated risk. Looking beyond the EU and NATO's recent strategic choices, we argue that the situation can only be resolved by re-engaging Russia in a renewed de-escalatory dialogue that involves both the EU and NATO with a greater emphasis on the nuanced, but important, distinctions between the integration and security dilemmas.
机译:乌克兰发生的事件重新点燃了人们对北约在冷战后的宗旨及其与欧盟的联系方式上的讨论。通过欧盟的制裁和北约的传统军事反应,西方使自己陷入了自相矛盾的局面,在这种情况下,为确保其东方盟国采取的每一个步骤都在增加,而不是扩散与俄罗斯的紧张关系。一方面,似乎数十年来精心设计的降级战略叙事现在处于困境。另一方面,确实可能是持久地试图建立冷战后的自由秩序,从而产生了“一体化困境”,并最终将俄罗斯推向了沃尔兹主义“安全困境”的防御现实主义逻辑。我们认为,北约的反应可能是基于程式化的威胁和历史性的怨恨,而不是基于精心计算的风险。除了欧盟和北约最近的战略选择之外,我们认为,只能通过使俄罗斯重新参与新的降级对话来解决局势,这种对话涉及欧盟和北约,并且更加强调细微但重要的区别在集成和安全困境之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号