首页> 外文期刊>European review >Nationalism and the Pan-historical Perspective in Early Middle Age Archaeology
【24h】

Nationalism and the Pan-historical Perspective in Early Middle Age Archaeology

机译:初中考古学中民族主义与泛历史视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Nationalism is a most general and worldwide phenomenon, known at least since European antiquity. It is also present in archaeological research, more intensively indeed in Central and Eastern Europe than in its Western counterpart. It is mostly connected with national prehistory, and its basic questions concern 'ancientness', 'previousness' and a high(er) culture, which are always the issues put forth in a comparison with others. Its emergence becomes more direct when manipulating constructed histories. Yet a decrease of its overall influencemay be expected in the long run. Panhistorism in archaeology partly stems from the overestimation of nineteenth- and early twentieth-century archaeological finds and was the view generally adopted by Soviet-type Marxism. Its aim is to render history useful for political manipulation. Its followers and advocates, however, are generally ill-informed about the methodological issues of research developed in the second half of twentieth century. We may, therefore, be somewhat more optimistic as to its impending disappearance.
机译:民族主义是一种最普遍和全球的现象,至少自欧洲古代以来已知。它还存在于考古学研究中,更集中在中欧和东欧而不是西方的同行。它主要与国家迄今核查相连,其基本问题涉及“古代”,“以前”和高(ER)文化,这些文化总是与他人相比提出的问题。在操纵构建的历史时,它的出现变得更直接。然而,在长期的情况下,预计其整体影响力的减少。考古学的持久性源于十九世纪和二十世纪初的考古发现的高估,并且是苏联马克思主义普遍采用的观点。它的目标是使历史可用于政治操纵。然而,它的追随者和倡导者普遍不明显了解二十世纪下半叶的研究方法论问题。因此,我们可能会对即将失踪更加乐观。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European review》 |2020年第3期|436-442|共7页
  • 作者

    Balint Csanad;

  • 作者单位

    Res Ctr Humanities Inst Archaeol Budapest Hungary;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号