...
首页> 外文期刊>European review >Overcoming European Civil War: Patterns of Consolidation in Divided Societies, 2010-1800
【24h】

Overcoming European Civil War: Patterns of Consolidation in Divided Societies, 2010-1800

机译:战胜欧洲内战:分裂社会中的巩固模式,2010-1800年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Divided, sometimes antagonistic, communities in officially unified nations seem to be the rule in Europe. In some cases, they conjure up the most painful memories of actual civilwar events, but usually they constitute the common experience of most Europeans, who lived through different kinds of war, revolutions, counter-revolutions, coups d'etat, dictatorships, totalitarian systems, regime changes, territorial losses, ethnic cleansings, and exchanges of population. In spite of major breakthroughs, we find all over Europe that the experiences and humiliations of previous generations have remained mainly unspoken and unelaborated at both individual and community levels. Dangerous as they are, such narratives and undigested traumas necessarily call for well-advised, learned and thoughtful acts of overwriting and reworking. A broadly based, well-founded, historical, multi- and interdisciplinary research project for the comparison of the various modes of trauma management in the different countries and regions of Europe can open up new perspectives and provide essential tools for working out individual and collective traumatic historical experiences. Its main question is how different communities were able to process their collective traumatic historical experiences, and what can be learned from the outcomes of these processes. The project will compare the common and different characteristics of the various regimes of memory and patterns of consolidation.
机译:在欧洲,统一的国家中分散的,有时是敌对的社区似乎是规则。在某些情况下,它们让人联想起实际内战事件中最痛苦的回忆,但通常,它们构成了大多数欧洲人的共同经历,他们经历过各种战争,革命,反革命,政变,独裁政权,极权主义制度,政权更迭,领土损失,种族清洗和人口交换。尽管取得了重大突破,但在整个欧洲,我们发现,在个人和社区层面上,前几代人的经历和屈辱仍然不言而喻。这样的叙述和未消化的创伤虽然具有危险性,但必然会要求他们进行明智的,明智的和深思熟虑的覆写和返工行为。一项基础广泛,经验丰富,历史悠久,跨学科和跨学科的研究项目,用于比较欧洲不同国家和地区的创伤管理的各种模式,可以开辟新的视角,并为研究个体和集体创伤提供重要的工具历史经验。它的主要问题是不同的社区如何能够处理其集体的创伤性历史经历,以及从这些过程的结果中可以学到什么。该项目将比较各种记忆方式和整合方式的共同和不同特征。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European review》 |2012年第4期|p.455-474|共20页
  • 作者

    IVAN ZOLTAN DENES;

  • 作者单位

    Budapest, Beregszasz ut 62, H-1112, Hungary;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号