首页> 外文期刊>European review >Reforming Property Law in Kosovo: A Clash of Legal Orders
【24h】

Reforming Property Law in Kosovo: A Clash of Legal Orders

机译:改革科索沃的物权法:法律秩序的冲突

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The legal framework regulating property in Kosovo has been defined as 'A jumble of laws, regulations, administrative instructions, court practices and directives combine to create a complicated and seemingly impenetrable system for determining contests over immovable property ownership in Kosovo. At the highest level, international human rights standards affect property rights.' 1 As in other areas of legislation, laws addressing property issues derive from different periods in Kosovo's history, that is to say the Yugoslav time, the so-called discriminatory period of the 1990s, UNMIK's rule of the first decade of the 2000s and, finally, independent Kosovo. Laws are scattered through several legal texts, regulate different aspects of property rights, and often refer to institutions that no longer exist. This paper focuses on the specific issues affecting property law in Kosovo, a sector where international organizations and bilateral cooperation are massively intervening. While assessing legal acts in force and data collected on the field, the author argues how, for an effective reformation of the sector, a clear and coordinated strategy will have to be adopted by the two main donors which, in the next few years, will be launching several technical assistance contracts. Comparing European best practices with the proposed intervention suggested by the European Union and USAID will also give the chance to illustrate how a strict adherence to ECHR standards in the field of property, as the Constitution of Kosovo requires, will bring to light problems already seen in other European countries, that is to say a clash between domestic civil legislation on property, on the one hand, and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on Article 1 Protocol 1, on the other. The author will also notice that the tendency to adopt a too political approach, typical of international organizations and donors, in an area characterized by legal principles of a more technical nature, will be cause for additional confusion.
机译:将科索沃财产的法律框架定义为:“法律,法规,行政指示,法院惯例和指示的混杂,共同构成了一个复杂的,看似难以理解的系统,用于确定对科索沃不动产所有权的争夺。在最高层次上,国际人权标准影响财产权。” 1与其他立法领域一样,处理财产问题的法律来自科索沃历史上的不同时期,即南斯拉夫时期,所谓的1990年代歧视时期,科索沃特派团对2000年代前十年的统治,最后是,独立的科索沃。法律散布在若干法律文本中,规范了产权的不同方面,并经常提到不再存在的机构。本文重点讨论影响科索沃财产法的具体问题,该领域是国际组织和双边合作正在大力介入的部门。在评估有效的法律行为和实地收集的数据时,作者认为,为了有效地对该部门进行改革,两个主要的捐助者将必须采用清晰而协调的策略,在接下来的几年中,这将是正在启动几项技术援助合同。将欧洲最佳实践与欧洲联盟和美国国际开发署建议的干预措施进行比较,也将有机会说明如何严格遵守《科索沃宪法》所要求的财产领域的ECHR标准,这将揭示已经存在的问题。其他欧洲国家,也就是说,一方面国内的财产民事立法与欧洲人权法院关于第一条第一议定书的判例法之间存在冲突。作者还将注意到,在以技术性更强的法律原则为特征的领域,倾向于采用过于政治化的做法,这是国际组织和捐助者所特有的趋势,这将引起进一步的混乱。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European review》 |2015年第4期|566-582|共17页
  • 作者

    Roccia Marco;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Kent, Kent Law Sch, Canterbury CT2 7NZ, Kent, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:39:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号