首页> 外文期刊>European Planning Studies >On the Territoriality of Cross-Border Cooperation: “Institutional Mapping” in a Multi-Level Context
【24h】

On the Territoriality of Cross-Border Cooperation: “Institutional Mapping” in a Multi-Level Context

机译:关于跨境合作的地域性:多层次背景下的“制度映射”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Territoriality is mostly discussed as the political competence to exert control on a certain space, in particular with regard to the nation state. Globalization and European Integration have initiated some debate on this understanding, but cross-cross-border cooperation has rarely been linked to this debate. In these areas enormous political changes have been seen during the recent years. Still, the territorial dimension cannot be addressed, as territoriality as known from nation states is challenging politics. However, the territorial implications are manifold and are increasing throughout Europe. Against this backdrop is conceptual reflection. This paper starts with a brief overview of discussions and the empirical implementation of the territoriality debate. Based on this, the paper attempts to catch up with the political changes - the reflection of cross-border territorialities in a two-fold way. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to this field. First, we propose a methodological approach to study the essential aspects. We study from a conceptual point of view, the dimensions of territoriality in cross-border contexts. These are explored as well as the political-juridical background of cross-border cooperation. Based on this, a C-B-IM-tool (Cross-Border Institutional Mapping) has been introduced, involving three steps: (a) (a1) multi-level mapping of cross-border institutions, (b) (a2) mapping of policy arenas and (c) (a3) mapping of the political topography in the sense of going beyond formalized and codified governance patterns. Secondly, with the example of the Greater Region around Luxembourg, the empirical and conceptual findings on cross-border territoriality are illustrated. We can state an establishing cross-border territoriality that does not replace domestic, state-centric territorialities but that inserts new and complex elements of a multi-level territoriality system.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673563
机译:地域性通常被讨论为在一定空间上施加控制的政治能力,尤其是在民族国家方面。全球化和欧洲一体化已经引发了关于这种理解的辩论,但是跨界合作很少与这场辩论联系在一起。在这些地区,近年来发生了巨大的政治变化。但是,领土范围仍然无法解决,因为民族国家所知的领土性正在挑战政治。但是,其领土影响是多种多样的,并且在整个欧洲范围内都在增加。在这种背景下是概念上的反思。本文首先简要讨论了有关领土辩论的讨论和经验性实施。在此基础上,本文试图赶上政治变化,即以两种方式反映跨国界。本文的目的是为这一领域做出贡献。首先,我们提出了一种方法论方法来研究基本方面。我们从概念的角度研究跨境背景下的领土范围。对这些问题以及跨境合作的政治法律背景进行了探讨。在此基础上,引入了CB-IM工具(跨境机构映射),涉及三个步骤:(a)(a1)跨境机构的多层次映射,(b)(a2)政策映射竞技场和(c)(a3)超越正式和规范化的治理模式的意义上的政治地形图。其次,以卢森堡周围的大区域为例,说明了跨境领土性的经验和概念性发现。我们可以声明一个已建立的跨界领土,该领土不能代替国内的,以国家为中心的领土,但可以插入多层次领土系统的新的复杂元素。查看全文下载全文”,services_compact:“ citeulike,网络振动,微博,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673563

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号