首页> 外文期刊>European Management Review >Are Survey Experiments as Valid as Field Experiments in Management Research? An Empirical Comparison Using the Case of Ethnic Employment Discrimination
【24h】

Are Survey Experiments as Valid as Field Experiments in Management Research? An Empirical Comparison Using the Case of Ethnic Employment Discrimination

机译:调查实验是否有效作为管理研究中的现场实验?使用族裔就业歧视的案例进行实证比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Field experiments have long been the gold standard in studies of organizational topics such as ethnic discrimination in recruitment. The recent use of survey experiments, also known as experimental vignettes, suggests that some researchers believe that survey experiments could be used as an alternative to field experiments. In this study we put this notion to the test. We perform a field experiment followed by two survey experiments on ethnic discrimination in recruitment. While the results of our field experiment are consistent with previous evidence on discrimination, one survey experiment concludes no difference between native and immigrant employees while another concludes positive discrimination. These results should invoke caution in researchers wanting to investigate organizational topics using survey experiments.
机译:现场实验长期以来一直是招聘中民族歧视等组织主题研究的金标准。最近使用调查实验,也称为实验羽毛图,表明一些研究人员认为,调查实验可作为现场实验的替代品。在这项研究中,我们将此通知提出了测试。我们执行一个现场实验,然后进行两次调查在招聘中的民族歧视实验。虽然我们的现场实验结果与以前的歧视证据一致,但一个调查实验在本土和移民雇员之间没有差异,而另一项判断是肯定的歧视。这些结果应在寻求使用调查实验调查组织主题的研究人员中判断谨慎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号