首页> 外文期刊>European Management Review >TQM and Performance Appraisal: Complementary or Incompatible?
【24h】

TQM and Performance Appraisal: Complementary or Incompatible?

机译:TQM和绩效评估:互补或不相容?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite the scholarly interest in performance management as a key determinant of the effectiveness of enterprise process improvement methods such as total quality management (TQM) and its derivatives, few empirical studies have explicitly explored the practice of performance management systems in TQM-focused organizations. In order to redress this imbalance, this study aims to describe how organizational and managerial forces led to a performance management systems failing to embrace the core principles of process improvement methods such as TQM. Using a qualitative study of six large UK-based automobile and auto parts manufacturers, our results illustrate how manager-controlled, individual-focused, past-oriented, long-cycle, and narrowly defined performance appraisal (PA) systems can intervene to underline the ultimate potential of TQM. The paper concludes with the discussion of implications for theory and practice of TQM and human resource performance management.
机译:尽管对绩效管理的学术兴趣作为企业流程改进方法的有效性的关键决定因素,如全面质量管理(TQM)及其衍生品,但很少有实证研究已明确探索了以TQM为中心的组织中绩效管理系统的实践。为了纠正这种不平衡,这项研究旨在描述组织和管理部队如何导致绩效管理系统未能接受流程改进方法的核心原则,如TQM。使用对六大大型汽车和汽车零部件制造商的定性研究,我们的结果说明了经理控制,个人聚焦,以过去,长周期和狭隘的性能评估(PA)系统可以介入强调TQM的最终潜力。本文讨论了讨论了TQM和人力资源绩效管理的理论和实践的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号