首页> 外文期刊>European management journal >The multifaceted nature of social practices: A review of the perspectives on practice-based theory building about organizations
【24h】

The multifaceted nature of social practices: A review of the perspectives on practice-based theory building about organizations

机译:社会实践的多面性:回顾关于组织的基于实践的理论的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A vibrant body of literature on social practices has developed rapidly in recent years. However, a systematic analysis of the underlying perspectives that shape the way practice-based scholars contribute to theory building about organizational phenomena has escaped scholarly attention. It is of pivotal importance to examine the multifaceted nature of social practices and understand the process by which new practice-based knowledge is developed. Our study addresses this gap by disentangling how researchers have adopted the knowledge, materiality, ethics, and politics perspectives that - as past influential work has informed us - are particularly relevant to practice-based theory building. In so doing, we categorize the body of literature into themes that correspond to the organizational phenomena examined by social practice scholars: practice boundaries and coordination of work, technology at work, strategy formation, local particulars structuring everyday work, and transformation of work practices. By uncovering how scholars adopt the four perspectives within each theme, our review shows that scholars (ⅰ) predominantly adopt the knowledge perspective, (ⅱ) neglect the politics perspective when looking 'inside' a social practice, (ⅲ) strikingly de-emphasize the ethics perspective, and (ⅳ) isolate each of the four perspectives used in theory building. We then examine in detail the implications of our work for future research on social practices and conclude with a number of theoretical and methodological suggestions.
机译:近年来,关于社会实践的文学蓬勃发展。但是,对影响实践型学者对组织现象理论构建做出贡献的基本观点的系统分析却引起了学术界的关注。检查社会实践的多面性并了解新的基于实践的知识的开发过程至关重要。我们的研究通过解开研究人员如何采用知识,实质性,伦理和政治观点来解决这一差距,正如过去的有影响力的研究告诉我们的那样,这些观点与基于实践的理论构建特别相关。通过这样做,我们将文学体分类为与社会实践学者研究的组织现象相对应的主题:实践界限和工作协调,工作中的技术,战略形成,构成日常工作的局部细节以及工作实践的转变。通过揭示学者如何采用每种主题的四种观点,我们的评论表明,学者(ⅰ)主要采用知识观点,(ⅱ)在社会实践“内部”看时忽略政治观点,(ⅲ)显着地强调了道德观点,和(ⅳ)隔离了理论构建中使用的四个观点。然后,我们详细研究了我们的工作对未来社会实践研究的意义,并提出了一些理论和方法上的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号