首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Social Work >Non-linear perspectives of risk in social care: using complexity theory and social geography to move the focus from individual pathology to the complex human environment
【24h】

Non-linear perspectives of risk in social care: using complexity theory and social geography to move the focus from individual pathology to the complex human environment

机译:社会护理风险的非线性观点:使用复杂性理论和社会地理将焦点从个人病理学转移到复杂的人类环境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Risk and risk assessment have come to dominate the discourse of social work. Increasingly, social work and social care practitioners operate under an umbrella of fearfulness and a reliance on procedures, structured risk assessment or actuarial risk tools that leave little room for professional judgement. This article argues that such notions are antithetical to good risk practice. The authors put forward an alternative paradigm based on complexity theory and social geography. This paradigm argues for a more dynamic approach to risk assessment and sets out to demonstrate the fallacy of existing risk assessment processes. The authors argue that children and adults at risk belong to complex adaptive systems that must be considered when looking to assess risk in such cases. Concepts from complexity theory such as emergence, fractals and self-organisation will be explored, along with concepts from social geography such as space, place and time. By seeing risk through the lenses of other disciplines, it is argued that a more realistic approach may be taken to risk assessment and combating the blame culture in social work.View full textDownload full textKeywordsRisk Assessment, Complex Adaptive Systems, Emergence, Interconnectedness, Space and PlaceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.702309
机译:风险和风险评估已成为社会工作的主流。社会工作和社会护理从业人员越来越多地在恐惧和依赖程序,结构化风险评估或精算风险工具的庇护下开展工作,而这些工作几乎没有进行专业判断的空间。本文认为,这些概念与良好的风险实践相对立。作者提出了基于复杂性理论和社会地理学的替代范式。该范式主张采用更动态的风险评估方法,并着手证明现有风险评估流程的谬误。作者认为,处于危险中的儿童和成年人属于复杂的适应系统,在评估此类情况下的风险时必须考虑这些系统。将会探索复杂性理论中的概念,例如出现,分形和自组织,以及社会地理学中的概念(例如空间,地点和时间)。通过从其他学科的角度看待风险,有人认为可以采用一种更现实的方法来进行风险评估和打击社会工作中的责备文化。查看全文下载全文关键字风险评估,复杂自适应系统,紧急状态,互连性,空间和PlaceRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2012.702309

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号