首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie >Birth Spacing in the Netherlands. The Effects of Family Composition, Occupation and Religion on Birth Intervals, 1820–1885
【24h】

Birth Spacing in the Netherlands. The Effects of Family Composition, Occupation and Religion on Birth Intervals, 1820–1885

机译:荷兰的生育间隔。家庭构成,职业和宗教对生育间隔的影响,1820-1885年

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, Dutch family reconstructions from the period 1820–1885 are analyst. Cox regression on birth intervals discloses that couples deliberately increased birth intervals already before the onset of the fertility transition. Spacing was not related to a targeted family size or to the sex composition of the family. Rather, the (temporary) burden of young, dependent children induced the parents to delay the next conception. Catholics and orthodox Protestants had shorter birth intervals than liberal Protestants, either because they rejected breastfeeding or because they were reluctant to experiment with birth spacing. Relatively long birth intervals were prevalent in the lowest social groups, whereas farmers and the self-employed middle class tended towards short intervals.
机译:在本文中,分析家是从1820年至1885年的荷兰家庭重建。出生间隔的Cox回归显示,夫妻在生育力转变开始之前就已经故意增加了出生间隔。间距与目标家庭规模或家庭性别组成无关。相反,年幼的,受抚养的孩子的(临时)负担促使父母推迟下一个受孕的时间。天主教徒和东正教新教徒的生育间隔比自由教徒新教徒短,这是因为他们拒绝母乳喂养或因为他们不愿尝试生育间隔。在最低的社会群体中,相对较长的生育间隔是普遍的,而农民和个体经营的中产阶级则倾向于较短的生育间隔。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号