首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Plant Pathology >Evaluation of non-chemical seed treatment methods for the control of Alternaria dauci and A. radicina on carrot seeds
【24h】

Evaluation of non-chemical seed treatment methods for the control of Alternaria dauci and A. radicina on carrot seeds

机译:评价非化学种子处理方法防治胡萝卜种子上的链格孢和链球菌的方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of physical methods (hot water, aerated steam, electron treatment) and agents of natural origin (resistance inducers, plant derived products, micro-organisms) as seed treatments of carrots for control of Alternaria dauci and A. radicina. Control of both Alternaria species by seed treatment with the resistance inducers was generally poor. Results were also not satisfactory with most of the formulated commercial micro-organism preparations. Based on the average of five field trials, one of these, BA 2552 (Pseudomonas chlororaphis), provided a low but significant increase in plant stand. Among the experimental micro-organisms, the best results were obtained with Pseudomonas sp. strain MF 416 and Clonostachys rosea strain IK726. A similar level of efficacy was provided by seed treatment with an emulsion (1%) of thyme oil in water. Good and consistent control was generally achieved with the physical methods aerated steam, hot water and electron treatment. Aerated steam treatment was, apart from the thiram-containing chemical standard, the best single treatment, and its performance may at least partially be due to extensive pre-testing, resulting in dosages optimally adapted to the respective seed lot. In some of the experiments the effect of the hot water treatment, which was tested at a fixed, not specifically adapted dosage, was significantly improved when combined with a Pseudomonas sp. MF 416 or C. rosea IK726 treatment. The results are discussed in relation to the outcome of experiments in which the same seed treatment methods and agents were tested in other seed-borne vegetable pathosystems.
机译:当前的研究开始是为了评估物理方法(热水,充气蒸汽,电子处理)和天然来源的药剂(抗性诱导剂,植物衍生产品,微生物)作为胡萝卜种子处理来控制链格孢菌的功效。 A. radicina。用抗性诱导剂进行种子处理对两种交链孢菌的控制普遍较差。大多数配制的商业微生物制剂的结果也不令人满意。根据五次田间试验的平均值,其中一项BA 2552(Pseudomonas chlororaphis)提供了较低但显着的株高增加。在实验微生物中,假单胞菌属sp获得最佳结果。菌株MF 416和玫瑰色梭菌IK726。通过用百里香油在水中的乳剂(1%)进行种子处理,可以提供相似的功效。通过物理方法充气,蒸汽,热水和电子处理通常可以实现良好而一致的控制。除含硫胺素的化学标准品外,充气蒸汽处理是最佳的单一处理方法,其性能至少部分是由于广泛的预先测试,导致剂量最佳地适应了各个种子批次。在某些实验中,与假单胞菌(Pseudomonas sp。)结合使用时,以固定的,未专门调整的剂量进行测试的热水处理效果得到了显着改善。 MF 416或玫瑰蔷薇IK726处理。讨论了与实验结果相关的结果,在其他种子传播的蔬菜病理系统中测试了相同的种子处理方法和试剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号