...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of marketing >The changing face of marketing academia: What can we learn from commercial market research and practitioners?
【24h】

The changing face of marketing academia: What can we learn from commercial market research and practitioners?

机译:营销学术界不断变化的面貌:我们可以从商业市场研究和从业人员那里学到什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This commentary was stimulated by two things. First, the apparently growing concerns within marketing academia with the gap between academia and practice. Throughout Europe academics are expressing the need to link their work closely with practitioners, yet there is little sign of urgency from those who influence research output. Second, the opportunities for changing academic practices illustrated by cultural changes taking place in commercial market research. Market researchers now approach their task differently: to begin with they are adopting a more relaxed attitude to their methodologies. Eclecticism and bricolage are the new vogue. They have become much more focused on what their internal customers want: help in making decisions. The change of name from market research to customer insight is but one symptom of this re-evaluation. This commentary questions the existing cultures of academic marketing research and publication, and asks what lessons we can learn from commercial market research. The paper concludes that applied marketing academics need to adopt a different set of priorities in comparison to their classical marketing colleagues. Commercial market researchers and applied academics share a requirement to make their research accessible, engaging and even actionable. There is little overt acknowkdgement of this at present, and until this changes, the current academic cultural norms may erect barriers to our messages getting across.
机译:这篇评论受到两件事的刺激。首先,市场学术界对学术界与实践之间的差距的关注日益明显。整个欧洲的学者都表示有必要将他们的工作与从业者紧密联系起来,但是影响研究成果的人却没有紧迫的迹象。第二,商业市场研究中发生的文化变化说明了改变学术惯例的机会。市场研究人员现在以不同的方式处理他们的任务:首先,他们对方法论采取更为宽松的态度​​。折衷主义和贿赂是新时尚。他们已经更加专注于内部客户的需求:帮助制定决策。名称从市场研究到客户洞察力的改变只是这种重新评估的一个征兆。该评论质疑学术营销研究和出版的现有文化,并询问我们可以从商业市场研究中学到什么教训。本文的结论是,与传统的营销同事相比,应用营销学者需要采用一套不同的优先级。商业市场研究人员和应用学者共同要求使他们的研究更容易获得,参与甚至是可行。目前对此还没有什么明确的认识,并且在这种变化发生之前,当前的学术文化规范可能会为我们传达信息提供障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号