首页> 外文期刊>European journal of law and economics >Judicial independence in the EU: a puzzle
【24h】

Judicial independence in the EU: a puzzle

机译:欧盟司法独立:一个难题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Based on data from the EU Justice Scoreboard, we identify a puzzle: National levels of judicial independence (as perceived by the citizens of EU member states) are negatively associated with the presence of formal legislation usually considered as conducive to judicial independence. We try to resolve this puzzle based on political economy explanations and specificities of legal systems, but to no avail. We then ask whether cultural traits can help to put together the puzzle. And indeed, countries with high levels of generalized trust (and to a lesser extent individualistic countries) exhibit increased levels of de facto judicial independence and, at the same time, reduced levels of de jure judicial independence. The combination of these two effects can explain why judicial reforms that should be conducive to an independent judiciary may seem to have adverse consequences. We conclude that cultural traits are of fundamental importance for the quality of formal institutions, even in societies as highly developed as the EU member states.
机译:根据欧盟司法记分牌的数据,我们发现一个难题:司法独立的国家水平(如欧盟成员国公民所知)与通常被认为有利于司法独立的正式立法的存在负相关。我们试图基于政治经济学的解释和法律制度的特殊性来解决这个难题,但无济于事。然后,我们问文化特征是否可以帮助解决这个难题。确实,具有高度普遍信任的国家(以及程度较小的个人主义国家)表现出事实上的司法独立水平提高,同时,法律上的司法独立水平也下降了。这两种影响的结合可以解释为什么应该有利于独立司法机构的司法改革可能会产生不利的后果。我们得出的结论是,即使在像欧盟成员国这样高度发达的社会中,文化特征对于正式机构的质量也至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号