...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of international management >Country- and firm-specific positions of different multinational enterprises: who is having what?
【24h】

Country- and firm-specific positions of different multinational enterprises: who is having what?

机译:不同跨国企业的国家和公司特定的职位:谁有什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper investigated country- and firm-specific positions of different MNE (multinational enterprises) types. A matrix has been developed based on the country- and firm-specific positions. Then, we have carried out 20 case studies and identified their positions in our matrix. Based on our findings we have installed five key propositions. Those propositions suggest that MNEs are more equipped with Firm-Specific Advantages (FSAs) whereas Emerging Market Multinationals (EMMs) have more Country-Specific Advantages (CSAs). MNEs are mostly persistent dominators and potential dictators and EMMs are mainly emerging operators and regional players. Finally, Micro Multinational Enterprises (mMNEs) are low on both CSA and FSA and they are mostly operation consolidators.
机译:本文调查了不同MNE(跨国企业)类型的国家和公司特定的立场。基于国家和公司特定职位开发了矩阵。然后,我们进行了20个案例研究,并在我们的矩阵中确定了他们的职位。根据我们的研究结果,我们已经安装了五个关键命题。这些命题表明,跨国公司更具配备特定的优势(FSA),而新兴市场跨国公司(EMM)具有更多的国家特定的优势(CSA)。 MNES大多是持久的统治者,潜在的独裁者和EMM主要是新兴的运营商和区域参与者。最后,CSA和FSA的微型跨国企业(MMNES)很低,它们主要是运营整合器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号