首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of International Law >Fighting Maritime Piracy under the European Convention on Human Rights
【24h】

Fighting Maritime Piracy under the European Convention on Human Rights

机译:根据《欧洲人权公约》与海上海盗作斗争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On the basis of real examples of anti-piracy operations conducted in the Indian Ocean by European navies, the article examines the legal implications of such military actions and their judicial medium- and long-term consequences in the framework of the European Convention on Human Rights. The only existing authority directly addressing maritime piracy, although from the sole perspective of state jurisdiction, is the recent Grand Chamber judgment in Medvedyev and Others v. France. The Court’s approach and conclusions in Medvedyev will be analysed in section 2. Section 3 will explore other important issues likely to be raised under the Convention by anti-piracy operations. Section 4 will consider the question of state responsibility, i.e., jurisdiction and attribution, in the context of anti-piracy operations carried out on the high seas or on the territory of third states.
机译:根据欧洲海军在印度洋进行的反海盗行动的实际例子,本文考察了此类军事行动的法律影响及其在《欧洲人权公约》框架内的司法中长期后果。尽管从国家管辖权的唯一角度来看,但直接解决海上海盗行为的唯一现存权威是最近在Medvedyev等人诉法国案中的大法庭判决。法院在梅德韦捷夫的做法和结论将在第2节中进行分析。第3节将探讨反盗版行动可能根据《公约》提出的其他重要问题。第4节将考虑在公海或第三国领土上进行的反海盗行动中的国家责任,即管辖权和归属问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号