首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >Social partners and the welfare state: Recalibration, privatization or collectivization of social risks?
【24h】

Social partners and the welfare state: Recalibration, privatization or collectivization of social risks?

机译:社会伙伴和福利国家:社会风险的重新校准,私有化或集体化?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

What has been the extent of welfare state retrenchment? One strand of the comparative political economy literature argues that welfare states have not undergone outright retrenchment, but recalibration. Another strand identifies a shift towards the privatization of risks and increased reliance on the market. Our article seeks to contribute to these debates with an alternative argument: collectivization of social risks. We employ a method of contextualized comparisons, examining three cases of collectivization across diverse contexts: the financing of disability insurance in the Netherlands, training provision for employed and unemployed in Greece, and regulation of atypical contracts in Italy. We conclude by discussing the ensuing political dynamics that the wider relevance of the argument brings to debates in comparative political economy and comparative industrial relations.
机译:福利国家裁员的程度如何?比较政治经济学文献的一小部分认为福利国家并没有进行彻底的裁员,而是进行了重新调整。另一股趋势表明,正在朝着风险私有化和对市场的依赖增加的方向发展。本文旨在通过另一种论点为这些辩论做出贡献:社会风险的集体化。我们采用情境化比较的方法,研究了在不同情况下的三种集体化案例:荷兰的残障保险融资,希腊的就业和失业培训规定以及意大利的非典型合同规定。最后,我们通过讨论随之而来的政治动力,来论证该论点的更广泛相关性在比较政治经济学和比较产业关系中引起了争论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号