首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >Social capital, 'Ghent' and workplace contexts matter: Comparing union membership in Europe
【24h】

Social capital, 'Ghent' and workplace contexts matter: Comparing union membership in Europe

机译:社会资本,“根特”和工作场所的环境很重要:欧洲工会会员资格的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Union density still varies considerably across Europe. This cross-national diversity has inspired multiple explanations ranging from institutional to workplace or socio-demographic factors. In this comparative multilevel analysis, we combine personal, workplace and macro-institutional explanations of union membership using the European Social Survey. By controlling for individual factors, we test the cross-national effect of meso- and macro-level variables, in particular workplace representation, establishment size, Ghent unemployment insurance and a society's social capital. We conclude that all these institutional and social contextual factors matter in explaining differences in union membership.
机译:欧洲各地的工会密度仍然相差很大。这种跨国多样性激发了从制度到工作场所或社会人口统计学因素的多种解释。在此比较性多层次分析中,我们使用《欧洲社会调查》将工会成员的个人,工作场所和宏观机构解释结合在一起。通过控制个体因素,我们测试了中观和宏观水平变量的跨国影响,特别是工作场所代表,机构规模,根特失业保险和社会的社会资本。我们得出结论,所有这些制度和社会背景因素都对解释工会会员资格的差异至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号