首页> 外文期刊>European journal of industrial relations >Explaining divergent bargaining outcomes for agency workers: The role of labour divides and labour market reforms
【24h】

Explaining divergent bargaining outcomes for agency workers: The role of labour divides and labour market reforms

机译:为中介工作者解释不同的讨价还价结果:劳动分工和劳动力市场改革的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Under what conditions can unions successfully regulate precarious employment? We compare the divergent trajectories of collective bargaining on agency work in the Italian and German metal sectors from the late 1990s. We explain the differences by the interaction between trade unions' institutional and associational power resources, mediated by employers' divide-and-rule strategies and by union strategies to (re)build a unitary front. In both countries, the liberalization of agency work allowed employers to exploit labour divides, undermining unions' associational power and preventing labour from negotiating effectively. However, while Italian unions remained 'trapped' in the vicious circle between weak legislation and fragmented labour, German unions were able to overcome their internal divides. The different degree of success depended on the nature of the divides within the labour movements.
机译:工会在什么条件下可以成功地管理不稳定的就业?我们比较了1990年代后期以来意大利和德国金属部门的集体劳资集体谈判的不同轨迹。我们通过工会的体制和协会权力资源之间的相互作用,由雇主的分而治之策略和由(重新)建立统一战线的工会策略来介导这些差异。在这两个国家中,机构工作的自由化使雇主可以利用劳动鸿沟,破坏工会的结社权,并阻止劳动进行有效的谈判。但是,尽管意大利工会仍然被困在立法薄弱和劳动力分散之间的恶性循环中,但德国工会却能够克服内部分歧。成功的不同程度取决于劳动运动中分歧的性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号