The WHICH? trial: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized, multicentre comparison of home- vs. clinic-based managementn         of chronic heart failure patients

Paul A. Scuffham

首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Heart Failure >The WHICH? trial: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized, multicentre comparison of home- vs. clinic-based managementn of chronic heart failure patients

【24h】

The WHICH? trial: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized, multicentre comparison of home- vs. clinic-based managementn of chronic heart failure patients

机译：哪个？试验：对慢性心力衰竭患者进行家庭和临床管理的实用，随机，多中心比较的原理和设计

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《European Journal of Heart Failure》 |2011年第8期|p.909-916|共8页
作者
Paul A. Scuffham;
展开▼
作者单位

Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, @%@, The University of Queensland, @%@, Curtin Health Innovative Research Institute, University of Technology/Curtin University, @%@, Monash University, @%@, @%@, Curtin Health Innovative Research Institute, Unive;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The WHICH? trial: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized, multicentre comparison of home- vs. clinic-based management of chronic heart failure patients. [J] . Stewart S, Carrington MJ, Marwick T, European journal of heart failure: journal of the Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology . 2011,第8期

机译：哪个？试验：对慢性心力衰竭患者进行家庭和临床管理的务实，随机，多中心比较的原理和设计。
2. Cost-effectiveness of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort - The WHICH? study (Which Heart Failure Intervention Is Most Cost-Effective & Consumer Friendly in Reducing Hospital Care) [J] . Maru Shoko, Byrnes Joshua, Carrington Melinda J., International Journal of Cardiology . 2015,第Null期

机译：家庭与临床治疗慢性心力衰竭的成本效益：实用，多中心随机试验队列的后续研究-WHICH？研究（在减少医院护理中，哪种心力衰竭干预措施最具成本效益和消费者友好性）
3. Prolonged impact of home versus clinic-based management of chronic heart failure: Extended follow-up of a pragmatic, multicentre randomized trial cohort [J] . StewartS., CarringtonM.J., HorowitzJ.D., International Journal of Cardiology . 2014,第3期

机译：家庭和诊所管理的慢性心力衰竭的长期影响：务实的多中心随机试验队列的扩展随访
4. Development and trial of ePoint.telemed - An open web-based platform for home monitoring of chronic heart failure patients [C] . J. Artur SERRANO, Halgeir HOLTHE Medical Informatics in Europe Conference. . 2015

机译：Epoint.Telemed的开发和试验 - 一种开放式基于网络监测的基于网络的慢性心力衰竭患者平台
5. Effects of a randomized controlled trial of diet and/or exercise on objectively measured physical activity levels in older heart failure patients [D] . Clevenger, Daniel Scott 2012

机译：饮食随机对照试验的影响及/或运动对较旧心力衰竭患者的客观测量体育活性水平
6. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) facilitated self-care rehabilitation intervention in heart failure patients and caregivers: rationale and protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial [O] . R S Taylor, C Hayward, V Eyre, 2015

机译：慢性心力衰竭康复支持（REACH-HF）的临床有效性和成本效益促进了心力衰竭患者和护理人员的自我保健康复干预：一项多中心随机对照试验的原理和方案
7. Rationale and design of MinerAlocorticoid Receptor antagonist Tolerability Study‐Heart Failure (ARTS‐HF): a randomized study of finerenone vs. eplerenone in patients who have worsening chronic heart failure with diabetes and/or chronic kidney disease [O] . Pitt Bertram, Anker Stefan D., Böhm Michael, 2015

机译：矿物质类皮质激素受体拮抗剂耐受性研究的基本原理和设计 - 心力衰竭（aRTs-HF）：慢性心力衰竭伴糖尿病和/或慢性肾脏疾病恶化的患者的一项关于苯肾上腺素与依匹乐酮的随机研究

The WHICH? trial: rationale and design of a pragmatic randomized, multicentre comparison of home- vs. clinic-based managementn of chronic heart failure patients

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅