首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of finance >Better cross hedges with composite hedging? Hedging equity portfolios using financial and commodity futures
【24h】

Better cross hedges with composite hedging? Hedging equity portfolios using financial and commodity futures

机译:使用复合套期更好的交叉套期保值?使用金融和商品期货对冲股票投资组合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Unless a direct hedge is available, cross hedging must be used. In such circumstances portfolio theory implies that a composite hedge (the use of two or more hedging instruments to hedge a single spot position) will be beneficial. The study and use of composite hedging has been neglected; possibly because it requires the estimation of two or more hedge ratios. This paper demonstrates a statistically significant increase in out-of-sample effectiveness from the composite hedging of the Amex Oil Index using S&P50O and New York Mercantile Exchange crude oil futures. This conclusion is robust to the technique used to estimate the hedge ratios, and to allowance for transactions costs, dividends and the maturity of the futures contracts.
机译:除非可以使用直接套期保值,否则必须使用交叉套期保值。在这种情况下,投资组合理论暗示复合套期保值(使用两个或多个套期工具对冲单个即期头寸)将是有益的。复合套期保值的研究和使用被忽略了。可能是因为它需要估计两个或多个对冲比率。本文证明,使用S&P50O和纽约商品交易所原油期货对美国运通原油指数进行复合套期保值,使样本外有效性显着提高。该结论对于估算套期保值比率的技术以及交易成本,股息和期货合约到期日的准备金是可靠的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号