首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of finance >Life-cycle funds: Much Ado about Nothing?
【24h】

Life-cycle funds: Much Ado about Nothing?

机译:生命周期基金:什么都没做?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The core idea of life-cycle funds or target-date funds is to decrease the fund's equity exposure and conversely increase its bond exposure towards the fund's target date. Such funds have been gaining significant market share and were recently set as default choice of asset allocation in numerous defined contribution schemes or related old-age provision products in several countries. Hence, an assessment of life-cycle funds' risk-return profiles - that is, the probability distribution of returns - is essential for sustainable financial planning of a large group of investors. This paper studies the risk-return profile of life-cycle funds in particular compared to simple balanced or lifestyle funds that apply a constant equity portion throughout the fund's term instead. In a Black-Scholes model, we derive balanced funds that reproduce the risk-return profile of an arbitrary life-cycle fund for single and regular contributions. We then analyze the accuracy of our results under more complex asset models with stochastic interest rates, stochastic equity volatility and jumps. We further show that frequently used rule of thumb approximations' that only take into account the life-cycle fund's average equity portion are not suitable to approximate a life-cycle fund's risk-return profile. Our results on the one hand facilitate sustainable financial planning and on the other hand challenge the very existence of life-cycle funds since appropriately calibrated balanced funds can offer a similar (often dominating) risk-return profile.
机译:生命周期基金或目标日期基金的核心思想是减少基金的股本敞口,反之则增加其在基金目标日之前的债券敞口。这类资金已经获得了巨大的市场份额,最近在许多国家被设置为众多定额供款计划或相关养老金产品中资产配置的默认选择。因此,对生命周期基金的风险收益概况(即收益的概率分布)进行评估对于一大批投资者的可持续财务计划至关重要。本文研究了生命周期基金的风险收益曲线,特别是与简单的平衡型或生活方式基金相比,后者在整个基金期限内均采用了固定资产份额。在Black-Scholes模型中,我们得出平衡的基金,该基金再现了单一和定期供款的任意生命周期基金的风险收益曲线。然后,我们在具有随机利率,随机资产波动率和跳跃的更复杂资产模型下分析结果的准确性。我们进一步表明,仅考虑生命周期基金的平均股权比例的常用经验法则近似值并不适合估算生命周期基金的风险收益曲线。我们的研究结果一方面促进了可持续的财务计划,另一方面也挑战了生命周期基金的存在,因为经过适当校准的平衡基金可以提供相似的(通常是主要的)风险收益曲线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号