...
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of engineering education >Analysis of macroethics teaching practices and perceptions in engineering: a cultural comparison
【24h】

Analysis of macroethics teaching practices and perceptions in engineering: a cultural comparison

机译:分析工程中的宏观伦理教学实践和观念:文化比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Students must be taught to understand the ethical issues associated with engineering and technology, which includes microethics and macroethics. This research examined the influence of cultural environment by comparing ethics-related education outcomes between educators in (1) the United States, (2) non-US Anglo, and (3) Western European countries who teach engineering students. In an increasingly globalised world where companies and projects draw from talent across countries, it is important to understand how different cultures educate future engineers about their ethical responsibilities. Survey results revealed that a majority of educators in all three groups viewed undergraduate and postgraduate education on ethics as insufficient. A higher percentage of non-US Anglo and Western European educators taught sustainability and environmental issues in their courses compared to US respondents. US educators taught codes of ethics, ethics in design, and safety more than those in Western Europe. Open-ended responses illuminated challenges and opportunities to improve ethics education.
机译:必须教会学生理解与工程和技术相关的伦理问题,包括微观伦理学和宏观伦理学。这项研究通过比较(1)美国,(2)非美国盎格鲁和(3)教工科学生的西欧国家的教育工作者之间与道德相关的教育成果,来研究文化环境的影响。在一个日益全球化的世界中,公司和项目都来自不同国家的人才,因此了解不同的文化如何教育未来的工程师承担其道德责任非常重要。调查结果显示,所有这三组中的大多数教育者都认为本科和研究生的道德教育不足。与美国受访者相比,非美国盎格鲁和西欧教育者在其课程中讲授可持续性和环境问题的比例更高。与西欧国家相比,美国教育者所教的道德规范,设计伦理和安全性更多。不限成员名额的答复阐明了改善道德教育的挑战和机遇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号