...
首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Apotex Inc v AstraZeneca Inc: IP Experts Take the Plunge into the Hot Tub
【24h】

Apotex Inc v AstraZeneca Inc: IP Experts Take the Plunge into the Hot Tub

机译:Apotex Inc诉AstraZeneca Inc:IP专家将其带入热水浴缸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Concurrent expert evidence is becoming a common feature of litigation in many jurisdictions, including Canada. Canada's Federal Court has allowed for adverse expert witnesses to testify concurrently since 2010, but only recently was this procedure used in an intellectual property case. This is an interesting and important development, but uncertainty remains about how and when the Federal Court s concurrent evidence procedure will be employed. The experience of courts in other jurisdictions provides guidance as to relevant factors the Federal Court should consider when contemplating invoking its concurrent expert evidence procedures in future cases.
机译:同时专家证据正成为包括加拿大在内的许多司法管辖区诉讼的共同特征。自2010年以来,加拿大联邦法院已允许不利的专家证人同时作证,但直到最近才在知识产权案件中使用此程序。这是一个有趣且重要的发展,但仍不确定如何以及何时采用联邦法院的并发证据程序。其他司法管辖区的法院经验为联邦法院在考虑未来案件中援用其同时进行的专家证据程序时应考虑的相关因素提供了指导。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号