首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Limitations and Exceptions as Key Elements of the Legal Framework for Copyright in the European Union: Opinion on the Judgment of the CJEU inCase C-201/13 Deckmyn: European Copyright Society
【24h】

Limitations and Exceptions as Key Elements of the Legal Framework for Copyright in the European Union: Opinion on the Judgment of the CJEU inCase C-201/13 Deckmyn: European Copyright Society

机译:限制与例外是欧盟版权法律框架的关键要素:关于CJEU案C-201 / 13中的判决的意见Deckmyn:欧洲版权协会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this Opinion, the European Copyright Society (ECS) puts on record its views on the issues raised by the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Deckmyn (C-201/13), which departs from the doctrine of strict interpretation of exceptions and limitations in cases in which fundamental rights such as freedom of expression are involved. The Opinion welcomes this development for the following reasons: first, because of the importance of exceptions and limitations in facilitating creativity and securing a fair balance between the protection of and access to copyright works; secondly, because of the Court's determination to secure a harmonised interpretation of the meaning of exceptions and limitations; thirdly, because of the Court s adoption of an approach to the interpretation of exceptions and limitations which promotes their effectiveness and purpose; and, finally, because of the CJEU's recognition of the role of fundamental rights in the copyright system: in particular, its recognition that the parodic use of works is justified by the right to freedom of expression. At the same time, the ECS recommends caution in constraining the scope of exceptions and limitations in a manner that may go beyond what might be considered necessary in a democratic society.
机译:在此意见中,欧洲版权协会(ECS)就欧盟法院在Deckmyn的判决(C-201 / 13)所提出的问题上的观点进行了记录,该判决背离了该学说涉及言论自由等基本权利的情况下,对例外与限制的严格解释。 《意见》对这一发展表示欢迎,其原因如下:首先,由于例外与限制在促进创造力和确保版权作品的保护与获取之间取得公平平衡的重要性;其次,由于法院决心确保对例外与限制的含义进行统一的解释;第三,由于法院采用了一种解释例外与限制的方法,可提高其效力和目的;最后,由于欧洲法院对基本权利在版权制度中的作用的认可:特别是,它承认对作品的偶发性使用以言论自由权为理由。同时,ECS建议谨慎限制例外和限制的范围,其方式可能超出民主社会认为必要的范围。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号