...
首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Music Remixing and Copyright Ownership in Arty v Marshmello
【24h】

Music Remixing and Copyright Ownership in Arty v Marshmello

机译:Arty V Marshmello中的音乐重新混音与版权所有权

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In Artem Stoliarov v Marshmello Creative LLC (a case on ownership of copyright in a remix), the US District Court for the Central District of California held that there was.no ground for the plaintiff-a Russian songwriter-to sue the defendants (including the US music producer Marshmello) as he had already contractually forfeited his rights over the remix composition. This case comment analyses the judgment and its implications, also highlighting the differences between remixes and remasters.
机译:在Artem Stoliarov v Marshmello Creative LLC(REMIX的版权所有权案例),加利福尼亚中央区的美国地区法院举行了。原告 - 俄罗斯歌曲作者 - 苏的俄罗斯歌曲作者 - 诉讼(包括 美国音乐制片人Marshmello)因为他已经在合同上丧失了对混音组成的权利。 本案评论分析了判断及其影响,也突出了混音和搅拌器之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号