首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Why Article 15 of the Directive on Copyright in the Single Digital Market Is a Bad Idea
【24h】

Why Article 15 of the Directive on Copyright in the Single Digital Market Is a Bad Idea

机译:为什么单一数字市场版权指令第15条是一个坏主意

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This opinion looks at art 15 of the Directive on Copyright in the Single Digital Market (CDSM Directive), the press publishers' right. Article 15 creates a right ancillary to copyright that benefits some publishers. It is triggered when some agents perform some online acts in respect of some specific content: in brief, online reproduction and making available news content produced by news publishers by commercial internet concerns. The opinion argues that art. 15 is deficient. Among other criticisms that can be made of the provision, the one made here is that the rationales for its passing contained the Recitals of the Directive are unconvincing given the nature of the right, and consequently it unduly benefits commercial news publishers. Moreover, the way art. 15 was passed reflects poorly on the European legislature.
机译:此观点看起来在单一数字市场(CDSM指令)中的版权指令15的艺术15,新闻发布者对。 第十五条将促进辅助的版权促进一些出版商。 当一些代理商在某些特定内容方面执行一些在线行为时,它是触发的:简要介绍,在线复制和通过商业互联网界面通过新闻出版商制作的可用新闻内容。 意见辩称这件艺术。 15是缺陷的。 除了可以做出规定的其他批评之外,这里制定的是,鉴于权利的性质,它的传递理由包含指令的重点是令人难以置信的,因此它过度福利商业新闻出版商。 而且,艺术方式。 15被通过反映欧洲立法机关不佳。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号