首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Attestation Marks and Pseudo-certification Marks: A Divergence of Roles in Trademark Law
【24h】

Attestation Marks and Pseudo-certification Marks: A Divergence of Roles in Trademark Law

机译:证明标志和伪认证标志:商标法中的角色分歧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Trade mark law is premised on the idea that trade marks and certification marks occupy different roles. This distinction, however, is not as binary as we may expect. This article explains how pseudo-certification marks, a previously unidentified type of mark, are being used as attestation marks indicating a departure from our understanding of the role of different types of marks. In light of this departure, this article considers the role of attestation marks in private governance regimes and the nature of certification marks as a form of intellectual property. This article argues the integrity of the trademark law system relies on different types of marks being regulated in light of their distinct roles, and pseudo-certification marks evade effective regulation. This article further argues that the trend of using pseudo-certification marks as attestation marks can be partially explained by the growing trend of developing brands around certifying marks and certifying bodies.
机译:商标法是前提的商标和认证标志占据不同角色的想法。然而,这种区别不像我们期望的那样二进制。本文介绍了伪认证标志,以前未识别的标记类型,被用作证明标志,表明我们对不同类型标记的作用的理解偏离。鉴于此次出发,本文认为证明标志在私人治理方面的作用以及作为一种知识产权的形式的认证标志的性质。本文认为,商标法系统的完整性依赖于鉴于其独特的角色调节不同类型的标记,而伪认证标志则避免有效的监管。本文进一步据称,可以部分地解释使用伪认证标志作为证明标志的趋势,通过开发认证标志和认证机构的越来越多的发展品牌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号