...
首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Heks'nkaas or the 'Fifty Shades of Taste' Explained by the CJEU through EU Copyright Law
【24h】

Heks'nkaas or the 'Fifty Shades of Taste' Explained by the CJEU through EU Copyright Law

机译:Heks'nkaas或CJEU通过欧盟版权法解释的“口味的五十种阴影”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

If the CJEU were to grant a prize to the 2018 most "original" copyright dispute, Levola Hengola v Smilde Foods (C-310/17) (the Heks'nkaas case) would undoubtedly stand among the nominees. The main reason why this case hit the spotlight is most probably because it touched upon the fundamentals of EU copyright law, namely its protectable subject-matter. Intriguingly, the complexities of copyright were unveiled by the following question: "Does Union law preclude the taste of food-as the author's own intellectual creation-from being protected by copyright?" Notwithstanding the court's dissenting answer, which clarified the scope of EU copyright law, it is of paramount importance to also discuss and unravel the ruling's preceding procedure, including the Opinion by the Advocate General, as it shed light on the many existing controversies within copyright law.
机译:如果欧洲法院要为2018年最“原始”的版权纠纷授予奖项,毫无疑问,列沃拉·亨戈拉(Levola Hengola)诉Smilde Foods(C-310 / 17)(Hek'nkaas案)将在提名名单中。该案备受关注的主要原因很可能是因为它触及了欧盟版权法的基本原则,即其可保护的主题。有趣的是,版权的复杂性由以下问题揭露:“联盟法是否排除了作为作者自己的智力创造的食物的味道-受版权保护?”尽管法院提出了不同意见,但澄清了法院的范围。在欧盟版权法中,讨论和解开该裁决的先前程序(包括总检察长的意见)至关重要,因为它阐明了版权法中许多现有的争议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号